IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v56y2019i16p3504-3521.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stratified and defensive planning democracy: Hearings on objections to plans in nine Israeli cities

Author

Listed:
  • Talia Margalit

    (Azrieli School of Architecture, Faculty of Arts, Tel Aviv University, Israel)

  • Adriana Kemp

    (Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Israel)

Abstract

This article contributes to the debate on inclusion and democracy in planning by comparing the answers given by five Israeli district committees to objections to planning proposals in nine cities, and by analysing their discourse in terms of socio-spatial inequality. We investigate how the committees’ answers to various professionals and civil actors, and how the type and degree of effort they invest in justifying their decisions, reflect their views of existing social divisions. We consider current theses on compromises to planning democracy. First, we follow urban regime theorists and compare the planners’ answers to objections submitted by their professional and development peers, and by ordinary people. Second, we follow theories on identity and class-related biases, and compare the committees’ answers to objectors along Israeli socio-spatial and ethnic disparities. Third, we trace planners’ post-political methods to simultaneously protect and legitimate their decisions. We demonstrate evidence of a combination of a positive bias towards the most powerful actors, a negative bias towards the least powerful ones, and many less obvious and neutral answers to those in the middle. We argue that with this array of answers and justifications, Israeli committees preserve a superficial display of inclusion and legitimation.

Suggested Citation

  • Talia Margalit & Adriana Kemp, 2019. "Stratified and defensive planning democracy: Hearings on objections to plans in nine Israeli cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(16), pages 3504-3521, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:56:y:2019:i:16:p:3504-3521
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098018810321
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098018810321
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098018810321?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oren Yiftachel & Margo Huxley, 2000. "Debating Dominence and Relevance: Notes on the ‘Communicative Turn’ in Planning Theory," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(4), pages 907-913, December.
    2. Igal Charney, 2013. "The Entrepreneurial Turn in the Context of a Central State: Evasive Planning Regulation for Ikea in Israel," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(8), pages 1845-1857, August.
    3. John Forester, 2012. "Learning to Improve Practice: Lessons from Practice Stories and Practitioners' Own Discourse Analyses (or Why Only the Loons Show Up)," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 11-26.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ela Romov & Na’ama Teschner, 2022. "A Place under the Sun: Planning, Landscape and Participation in a Case of a Solar Powerplant in the Israeli Desert," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Margalit, Talia & Mualam, Nir, 2020. "Selective rescaling, inequality and popular growth coalitions: The case of the Israeli national plan for earthquake preparedness," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jaap G Rozema & Bonno Pel, 2014. "Confronting Momentum: Mapping the Social Appraisals of an ‘Inevitable’ Motorway Capacity Expansion," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(8), pages 2000-2015, August.
    2. Farhad Mukhtarov & Andrea Gerlak & Robin Pierce, 2017. "Away from fossil-fuels and toward a bioeconomy: Knowledge versatility for public policy?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(6), pages 1010-1028, September.
    3. Marleau Donais, Francis & Abi-Zeid, Irène & Waygood, E. Owen D. & Lavoie, Roxane, 2022. "Municipal decision-making for sustainable transportation: Towards improving current practices for street rejuvenation in Canada," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 152-170.
    4. Wang, Yongcheng & Yamaguchi, Keita & Wong, Yiik Diew, 2020. "The multivalent nexus of redevelopment and heritage conservation: A mixed-methods study of the site-level public consultation of urban development in Macao," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    5. Prathiwi Widyatmi Putri, 2020. "Insurgent planner: Transgressing the technocratic state of postcolonial Jakarta," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(9), pages 1845-1865, July.
    6. Daphna Levine & Shai Sussman & Meirav Aharon-Gutman, 2022. "Spatial-temporal patterns of self-organization: A dynamic 4D model for redeveloping the post-zoning city," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(3), pages 1005-1023, March.
    7. Alfasi, Nurit & Migdalovich, Eyal, 2020. "Losing faith in planning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:56:y:2019:i:16:p:3504-3521. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.