IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v53y2016i10p2004-2022.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Walking with the ghosts of the past: Unearthing the value of residents’ urban nostalgias

Author

Listed:
  • David Adams
  • Peter Larkham

Abstract

Nostalgia has historically been negatively characterised by desire to reconnect with an idealised past lost to the ‘destructive’ forces of modernity, but studies across the social sciences have recently sought to re-appraise the creative and embodied significance of individuals’ recollections. This paper contributes to this developing debate by empirically exploring the value of individual remembering in relation to the urban material landscape. First, drawing on recently collected go-along data from long-term residents of two UK cities, Birmingham and Coventry, it is argued that nostalgia could be considered a more progressive force in urban life, especially amongst residents in cities that have undergone and are undergoing physical change as a consequence of ‘official’ attempts to reconstruct, regenerate and/or repackage particular urban spaces; developing a richer understanding of the interplay between official and unofficial nostalgias can better inform planning decisions that are more likely to be socially acceptable and supported by local communities. Second, though there are clear advantages of developing a fuller theoretical and methodological consideration of urban nostalgia, this paper then uses go-along data to demonstrate that much remains to be learnt from exploring how the material urban environment can encourage and/or limit individual efforts to keep potentially distressing aspects of their past concealed.

Suggested Citation

  • David Adams & Peter Larkham, 2016. "Walking with the ghosts of the past: Unearthing the value of residents’ urban nostalgias," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(10), pages 2004-2022, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:53:y:2016:i:10:p:2004-2022
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098015588683
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098015588683
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098015588683?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Duncan Light & Craig Young, 2014. "Habit, Memory, and the Persistence of Socialist-Era Street Names in Postsocialist Bucharest, Romania," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 104(3), pages 668-685, May.
    2. Stephen Legg, 2007. "Reviewing Geographies of Memory/Forgetting," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(2), pages 456-466, February.
    3. Graham Farmer & John Pendlebury, 2013. "Conserving Dirty Concrete: The Decline and Rise of Pasmore's Apollo Pavilion, Peterlee," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 263-280, May.
    4. Tovi Fenster & Chen Misgav, 2014. "Memory and place in participatory planning," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 349-369, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fatmaelzahraa Hussein & John Stephens & Reena Tiwari, 2020. "Memory for Social Sustainability: Recalling Cultural Memories in Zanqit Alsitat Historical Street Market, Alexandria, Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Trevor J Wideman & Jeffrey R Masuda, 2018. "Toponymic assemblages, resistance, and the politics of planning in Vancouver, Canada," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(3), pages 383-402, May.
    3. Chloupek Brett R., 2019. "Post-communist city text in Košice, Slovakia as a liminal landscape," Miscellanea Geographica. Regional Studies on Development, Sciendo, vol. 23(2), pages 71-75, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:53:y:2016:i:10:p:2004-2022. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.