IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v45y2008i10p2057-2074.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Immigrant Church as an Urban Service Hub

Author

Listed:
  • David Ley

    (Department of Geography, University of British Columbia, 1984 West Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z2, Canada, dley@geog.ubc.ca)

Abstract

This paper draws from interviews conducted with leaders of 46 immigrant Christian churches in Vancouver. The congregations comprise newcomers from Korea, ethnic Chinese who are primarily recent immigrants and an older post-1945 German migration. The churches are identified as a hub in which relations of trust and compatibility generate bonding social capital; from this base, a wide range of personal and social services is provided, significantly aiding co-ethnic members to adapt to their new conditions. In a neo-liberal era, the state is facilitating such activities as part of a policy of contracting-out its own former in-house functions. The capacity of the immigrant church to serve both its own members and adherents and also a broader expanded constituency beyond its co-ethnic clients is important. The paper examines the activities of some of the churches in this transition from bonding to bridging social capital and the challenges that they confront.

Suggested Citation

  • David Ley, 2008. "The Immigrant Church as an Urban Service Hub," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(10), pages 2057-2074, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:45:y:2008:i:10:p:2057-2074
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098008094873
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098008094873
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098008094873?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Margit Mayer, 2003. "The onward sweep of social capital: causes and consequences for understanding cities, communities and urban movements," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 110-132, March.
    2. Georgia A. Persons, 2004. "National Politics and Charitable Choice as Urban Policy for Community Development," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 594(1), pages 179-181, January.
    3. Georgia A. Persons, 2004. "National Politics and Charitable Choice as Urban Policy for Community Development," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 594(1), pages 65-78, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Franz Buhr & Jennifer McGarrigle, 2017. "Navigating Urban Life in Lisbon: A Study of Migrants’ Mobilities and Use of Space," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 226-234.
    2. Bucheli, José R. & Fontenla, Matías & Waddell, Benjamin James, 2019. "Return migration and violence," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 113-124.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Conradson, 2008. "Expressions of Charity and Action towards Justice: Faith-based Welfare Provision in Urban New Zealand," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(10), pages 2117-2141, September.
    2. Nick Bailey & Madeleine Pill, 2015. "Can the State Empower Communities through Localism? An Evaluation of Recent Approaches to Neighbourhood Governance in England," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(2), pages 289-304, April.
    3. Esin Özdemir & Ayda Eraydin, 2017. "Fragmentation in Urban Movements: The Role of Urban Planning Processes," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(5), pages 727-748, September.
    4. Andrew McCulloch & John Mohan & Peter Smith, 2012. "Patterns of Social Capital, Voluntary Activity, and Area Deprivation in England," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(5), pages 1130-1147, May.
    5. Monika Egerer & Elsa Anderson, 2020. "Social-Ecological Connectivity to Understand Ecosystem Service Provision across Networks in Urban Landscapes," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Gillian Bristow & Tom Entwistle & Frances Hines & Steve Martin, 2008. "New Spaces for Inclusion? Lessons from the ‘Three‐Thirds’ Partnerships in Wales," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 903-921, December.
    7. Mangialardo, Alessia & Micelli, Ezio, 2021. "Grass-roots participation to enhance public real estate properties. Just a fad?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    8. RUTH McALISTER, 2010. "Putting the ‘Community’ into Community Planning: Assessing Community Inclusion in Northern Ireland," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 533-547, September.
    9. Cynthia Horan, 2004. "Community Development, Racial Empowerment, and Politics," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 594(1), pages 158-170, July.
    10. Alison Brown & Michal Lyons & Ibrahima Dankoco, 2010. "Street Traders and the Emerging Spaces for Urban Voice and Citizenship in African Cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(3), pages 666-683, March.
    11. Marit Rosol, 2010. "Public Participation in Post‐Fordist Urban Green Space Governance: The Case of Community Gardens in Berlin," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 548-563, September.
    12. Meng Wang & Yaoqiu Kuang & Ningsheng Huang, 2015. "Sustainable Urban External Service Function Development for Building the International Megalopolis in the Pearl River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-26, September.
    13. Jenny Muir, 2011. "Bridging and Linking in a Divided Society," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(5), pages 959-976, April.
    14. Maarten Loopmans & Gavin Brown & Valerie De Craene, 2021. "Everyday Spatialities of Intersectional Solidarity and Activism," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 112(2), pages 101-106, April.
    15. Alex Aylett, 2010. "Conflict, Collaboration and Climate Change: Participatory Democracy and Urban Environmental Struggles in Durban, South Africa," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 478-495, September.
    16. Santiago Eizaguirre & Marc Pradel & Albert Terrones & Xavier Martinez-Celorrio & Marisol García, 2012. "Multilevel Governance and Social Cohesion: Bringing Back Conflict in Citizenship Practices," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(9), pages 1999-2016, July.
    17. Paul Chatterton, 2010. "So What Does It Mean to be Anti-capitalist? Conversations with Activists from Urban Social Centres," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(6), pages 1205-1224, May.
    18. Louis Albrechts, 2004. "Strategic (Spatial) Planning Reexamined," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 31(5), pages 743-758, October.
    19. Richard Lang & Andreas Novy, 2011. "Housing Cooperatives and Social Capital: The Case of Vienna," SRE-Disc sre-disc-2011_02, Institute for Multilevel Governance and Development, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    20. María Luisa Méndez & Gabriel Otero & Felipe Link & Ernesto López Morales & Modesto Gayo, 2021. "Neighbourhood cohesion as a form of privilege," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(8), pages 1691-1711, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:45:y:2008:i:10:p:2057-2074. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.