IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v24y1987i2p137-150.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Received Concepts and Theories in African Urbanisation Studies and Urban Management Strategies: A critique

Author

Listed:
  • Don C. I. Okpala

    (United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (HABITAT) P.O. Box 60040, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia)

Abstract

Concepts and theories employed in today's African urban studies have often been transfers from Western urbanisation Studies which have embodied transfers of cultural values. These have generally been applied without paying enough attention either to indigenous sociocultural and value systems, nor to analysing and interpreting the relevance of Africa's point in an urban evolutionary continuum. The uncritical transfer and application of such concepts has led to prescriptions and recommendations for urban management policies and programmes that have proved largely ineffective, and involved much misdirection and misapplication of limited resources. The consequence has been the continued exacerbation and compounding of urban problems. It is argued that effective policy responses can only be derived from a more realistic evaluation of African urban problems, based not only on Western European analytical perspectives, but also on the analysis of economic, historical socio-cultural factors indigenous to Africa itself.

Suggested Citation

  • Don C. I. Okpala, 1987. "Received Concepts and Theories in African Urbanisation Studies and Urban Management Strategies: A critique," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 24(2), pages 137-150, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:24:y:1987:i:2:p:137-150
    DOI: 10.1080/713703867
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/713703867
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/713703867?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charles J. Stokes, 1962. "A Theory of Slums," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 38(3), pages 187-197.
    2. Okpala, Don. C. I., 1978. "Urban ecology and residential location theories: Application in nigeria's socio-cultural milieu," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 177-183.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Baye, Fentaw & Wegayehu, Fisseha & Mulugeta, Solomon, 2020. "Drivers of informal settlements at the peri-urban areas of Woldia: Assessment on the demographic and socio-economic trigger factors," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    2. Shashwati Banerjee & Kishor Goswami, 2020. "Self-employed or Paid Employed: Who can Earn more among the Slum Dwellers and Why?," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 20(1), pages 7-25, January.
    3. Alan Gilbert, 2007. "The Return of the Slum: Does Language Matter?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 697-713, December.
    4. Gunnar Blomé, 2011. "The return of the Swedish slumlord: Analysis of a recent case," ERES eres2011_65, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    5. Lee Pugalis & Bob Giddings & Kelechi Anyigor, 2014. "Reappraising the World Bank responses to rapid urbanisation: Slum improvements in Nigeria," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 29(4-5), pages 519-540, June.
    6. Lila Leontidou, 1993. "Postmodernism and the City: Mediterranean Versions," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 30(6), pages 949-965, June.
    7. Sabyasachi Tripathi, 2015. "Determinants of Large City Slum Incidence in India: A Cross‐Sectional Study," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(1), pages 22-43, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:24:y:1987:i:2:p:137-150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.