IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v1y1996i1p69-79.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Has Funding Made a Difference to Research Methods?

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer Platt

Abstract

It has been argued that foundation funding has distorted methods in American sociology in the direction of quantification. This argument rests on a number of assumptions, of which the key one is that in the absence of such funding, method would have developed differently. Data on the methods of funded and unfunded research articles are analysed, and show that the trend to increasing levels of quantification is almost equally present in unfunded work, which suggests that funding should not be held responsible for the trend.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer Platt, 1996. "Has Funding Made a Difference to Research Methods?," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 1(1), pages 69-79, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:1:y:1996:i:1:p:69-79
    DOI: 10.5153/sro.7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.7
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5153/sro.7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. U. Kelle, 1997. "Theory Building in Qualitative Research and Computer Programs for the Management of Textual Data," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 2(2), pages 10-22, June.
    2. Peter Chen & S.M. Hinton, 1999. "Realtime Interviewing Using the World Wide Web," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 4(3), pages 63-81, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:1:y:1996:i:1:p:69-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.