IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v13y2008i5p13-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

My Family and Other Animals[1]: Pets as Kin

Author

Listed:
  • Nickie Charles
  • Charlotte Aull Davies

Abstract

The title of this paper gives a family-like character to animals and an animal-like character to the idea of family. It emphasises the close, family and friend-like relationships that can exist between human beings and the animals who share their domestic space. This type of relationship between humans and their pets emerged during a study of families and kinship and in this paper we draw on 193 in-depth interviews conducted in four contrasting areas of a South Wales city. Although our interview schedules did not explicitly ask about animals, a significant proportion of our interviewees spontaneously included their pets as part of their kinship networks. There were two points during the interview when the significance of pets became apparent: when interviewees were asked who counted as family and when they were asked to complete a network diagram. In studies of kinship it has been said that pets are substitutes for children, providing emotional satisfaction. Here we explore some of the other ways in which animals are constructed as kin and discuss whether such constructions confound the (socially constructed) boundary between nature and culture.

Suggested Citation

  • Nickie Charles & Charlotte Aull Davies, 2008. "My Family and Other Animals[1]: Pets as Kin," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 13(5), pages 13-26, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:13:y:2008:i:5:p:13-26
    DOI: 10.5153/sro.1798
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.1798
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5153/sro.1798?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jacqui Gabb, 2011. "Family Lives and Relational Living: Taking Account of Otherness," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 16(4), pages 141-150, December.
    2. Erika Cudworth, 2022. "Labors of love: Work, labor, and care in dog–human relations," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 830-844, May.
    3. D’Souza, Clare & Apaolaza, Vanessa & Hartmann, Patrick & Nguyen, Ninh, 2023. "The consequence of possessions: Self-identity, extended self, psychological ownership and probabilities of purchase for pet’s fashion clothing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:13:y:2008:i:5:p:13-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.