IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v12y2007i3p1-13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

(Re)Using Qualitative Data?[1]

Author

Listed:
  • Niamh Moore

Abstract

Recent interest by social scientists in the questions posed by reusing qualitative data has been prompted by two related events. The first is the establishment of the Qualitative Data Archival Resource Centre (QUALIDATA, and, since 2003, ESDS Qualidata) at the University of Essex in 1994. The second is the publication of the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) Datasets Policy (1996) which asks that those in receipt of ESRC grants offer copies of their data for deposit to QUALIDATA. This perceived injunction to archive data has been met with resistance by recalcitrant researchers who are wary of the implications of depositing data, and the possibilities of reusing data. The debate risks becoming polarised between those advocating the archiving and reuse of qualitative data, and those more sceptical of these possibilities. This paper aims to open up this debate and to seek a more fruitful path between these positions. I begin by calling into question the supposed ‘newness’ of reusing qualitative data, through turning to examine some of the assumptions embedded in the key terms and premises of the debate thus far, including the reliance on distinctions between primary and secondary data and primary and secondary analysis. I examine some common tropes in accounts of reusing data: comparisons with secondary analysis of quantitative data; efforts to distinguish between reusing qualitative data in a sociological context and other disciplinary and methodological traditions; and reliance on particular interpretations of key principles of qualitative research, context and reflexivity, in establishing the challenges of the reusing of qualitative data. I suggest that reuse may be more productively understood as a process of recontextualising data, and that attending to the reflexive production of data in the contemporary research project may offer more hopeful possibilities for reuse. I conclude by offering some reflections on why discussions of reusing qualitative data appear to have become so fraught.

Suggested Citation

  • Niamh Moore, 2007. "(Re)Using Qualitative Data?[1]," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 12(3), pages 1-13, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:12:y:2007:i:3:p:1-13
    DOI: 10.5153/sro.1496
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.1496
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5153/sro.1496?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kahryn Hughes & Jason Hughes & Anna Tarrant, 2022. "Working at a remove: continuous, collective, and configurative approaches to qualitative secondary analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 375-394, April.
    2. Catherine Dodds & Peter Keogh & Adam Bourne & Lisa McDaid & Corinne Squire & Peter Weatherburn & Ingrid Young, 2021. "The Long and Winding Road: Archiving and Re-Using Qualitative Data from 12 Research Projects Spanning 16 Years," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 26(2), pages 269-287, June.
    3. Cova, Bernard & Ivens, Björn Sven & Spencer, Robert, 2021. "The ins and outs of market shaping: Exclusion as a darkside?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 483-493.
    4. Sasha Williams & Ian Law, 2012. "Legitimising Racism: An Exploration of the Challenges Posed by the Use of Indigeneity Discourses by the Far Right," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 17(2), pages 1-12, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:12:y:2007:i:3:p:1-13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.