IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v69y2023i2p313-321.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychosocial factors associated with mother–infant bonding in Indonesian samples

Author

Listed:
  • Kusuma Minayati
  • Raden Irawati ismail
  • Fiona Valerie Muskananfola
  • Teresia Putri Widia Nugraheni
  • Shafira Chairunnisa
  • Nathaniel Evan Raphaela Wiriadinata
  • Michael Sugiyanto
  • Angelina Clarissa
  • Kent Pradana
  • Tjhin Wiguna

Abstract

Background: Mother–infant bonding is an important factor that supports an infant’s socio-emotional development. Therefore, every family member should acknowledge these processes, especially in an extended family set-up like in Indonesia. The general study objective was to predict several socio-demographic factors associated with mother–infant bonding in Indonesian samples. Method: This is a cross-sectional study. The participants included 168 mothers who had infants aged 0 to 36 months and willingly joined the study by signing the informed consent form. The Indonesian version of mother–infant bonding scale and a socio-demographic questionnaire were administered to all mothers. Logistic regression was applied to identify the socio-demographic factors that had any association with the mother–infant bonding scale. The data were analyzed using the SPSS program version 21 for Mac. Results: The study showed that 13.1% of the participants were categorized as having a moderate-to-high level of impaired mother–infant bonding. Logistic regression analysis showed that vaginal or normal delivery mode was 4.07 (95% CI [1.27, 13.09]) times more likely to exhibit low levels of impaired mother–infant bonding compared to a cesarean section. The model explained 18.6% (Nagelkerke R 2 ) of the variance in impaired mother–infant bonding and accurately classified 86.9% of cases. Conclusion: The findings support prior studies that have been conducted in several countries. Psychoeducation on supporting mother–infant bonding may consist of several topics, such as the advantages of vaginal delivery mode and the importance of family support. It may be delivered in the early adulthood period and, hopefully, basic knowledge during those periods may help strengthen the understanding of mother–infant dyad issues among all family members.

Suggested Citation

  • Kusuma Minayati & Raden Irawati ismail & Fiona Valerie Muskananfola & Teresia Putri Widia Nugraheni & Shafira Chairunnisa & Nathaniel Evan Raphaela Wiriadinata & Michael Sugiyanto & Angelina Clarissa , 2023. "Psychosocial factors associated with mother–infant bonding in Indonesian samples," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 69(2), pages 313-321, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:69:y:2023:i:2:p:313-321
    DOI: 10.1177/00207640221087616
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00207640221087616
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00207640221087616?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Esther Abena Adama & Sara Bayes & Deborah Sundin, 2018. "Parents’ experiences of caring for preterm infants after discharge with grandmothers as their main support," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(17-18), pages 3377-3386, September.
    2. Karolina Lutkiewicz & Łucja Bieleninik & Mariusz Cieślak & Mariola Bidzan, 2020. "Maternal–Infant Bonding and Its Relationships with Maternal Depressive Symptoms, Stress and Anxiety in the Early Postpartum Period in a Polish Sample," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-12, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hanna Przybyła-Basista & Elżbieta Kwiecińska & Michalina Ilska, 2020. "Body Acceptance by Pregnant Women and Their Attitudes toward Pregnancy and Maternity as Predictors of Prenatal Depression," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Łucja Bieleninik & Mark Ettenberger & Shulamit Epstein & Cochavit Elefant & Shmuel Arnon, 2021. "Potential Psychological and Biological Mechanisms Underlying the Effectiveness of Neonatal Music Therapy during Kangaroo Mother Care for Preterm Infants and Their Parents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-12, August.
    3. Eva S. Potharst & Manon Kuijl & Daphne Wind & Susan M. Bögels, 2022. "Do Improvements in Maternal Mental Health Predict Improvements in Parenting? Mechanisms of the Mindful with Your Baby Training," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-21, June.
    4. Joanna Dymecka & Rafał Gerymski & Adrianna Iszczuk & Mariola Bidzan, 2021. "Fear of Coronavirus, Stress and Fear of Childbirth in Polish Pregnant Women during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-10, December.
    5. Genova Federica & Tambelli Renata & Eleonora Marzilli, 2023. "Parental Postnatal Depression in the Time of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review of Its Effects on the Parent–Child Relationship and the Child’s Developmental Outcomes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-25, January.
    6. Janeth Juarez Padilla & Chelsea R. Singleton & Cort A. Pedersen & Sandraluz Lara-Cinisomo, 2022. "Associations between Self-Rated Health and Perinatal Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms among Latina Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-13, September.
    7. Concetta Polizzi & Giovanna Perricone & Maria Regina Morales & Sofia Burgio, 2021. "A Study of Maternal Competence in Preterm Birth Condition, during the Transition from Hospital to Home: An Early Intervention Program’s Proposal," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-24, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:69:y:2023:i:2:p:313-321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.