IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v66y2020i3p292-299.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Similar psychosis risks in adoptees and immigrants

Author

Listed:
  • Mary V Seeman

Abstract

Background: There is a consensus that adoptees and immigrants both experience more mental health problems than their peers. The two groups share many risk factors for psychosis, but an increased risk for psychotic illness has only been demonstrated for immigrants. Aims: The aim of this review is to describe psychosis risk factors in adoptees, with a focus on difficulties with identity formation, identification with in-groups, attachment to parents, and coping with loss and with discrimination. Method: The literature in these five areas is reviewed as it pertains to adoption and psychosis. Results: There are no clear findings because the relevant studies have not been done, but the literature suggests that adopted children face challenges very similar to those of immigrants to a new country. Conclusion: The immigration field and the adoption field have much to learn from each other. It is recommended that a prevention strategy analogous to increased neighbourhood ethnic density be implemented with adoptees – that they be intentionally exposed from early childhood and throughout adolescence to age peers who share a similar background and with whom they can readily identify. It is also recommended that immigrants be welcomed into their host country with the same open arms as adoptive parents welcome their new children.

Suggested Citation

  • Mary V Seeman, 2020. "Similar psychosis risks in adoptees and immigrants," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 66(3), pages 292-299, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:66:y:2020:i:3:p:292-299
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764020903324
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764020903324
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764020903324?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Watson, Debbie L. & Latter, Sandra & Bellew, Rebecca, 2015. "Adopted children and young people's views on their life storybooks: The role of narrative in the formation of identities," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 90-98.
    2. Melero, Sandra & Sánchez-Sandoval, Yolanda, 2017. "Mental health and psychological adjustment in adults who were adopted during their childhood: A systematic review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 188-196.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Steenbakkers, Anne & van der Steen, Steffie & Grietens, Hans, 2016. "‘To talk or not to talk?’: Foster youth's experiences of sharing stories about their past and being in foster care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 2-9.
    2. Wright, Anna W. & Carlson, Kiri & Grotevant, Harold D., 2022. "Internalizing symptoms and use of mental health services among domestic adoptees," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    3. Yolanda Sánchez-Sandoval & Sandra Melero & Ana María López-Jiménez, 2020. "Mediating Effects of Social Support in the Association Between Problems in Childhood and Adolescence and Well-Being in Adult Domestic Adoptees," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 1183-1198, April.
    4. Kontomichalos-Eyre, Soula A. & Lake, Amelia J. & McGillivray, Jane A., 2023. "Life story work for children and youth in out of home care: A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:66:y:2020:i:3:p:292-299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.