IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v48y2017i6p814-831.html

Designing With Game-Based Learning: Game Mechanics From Middle School to Higher Education

Author

Listed:
  • Larysa Nadolny
  • Zina Alaswad
  • Dennis Culver
  • Wei Wang

Abstract

Background. The use of game-based learning strategies in higher education has shown promise to increase student motivation and achievement. Little is known about which game mechanics are most appropriate and effective for learners at different academic levels. Aim. This article examines teacher selection and implementation of game mechanics in 27 courses from middle school to higher education designed with game-based learning. Method. 27 educators participated in an open-ended survey on the design of their course. Measures included an open response survey on patterns and design of game mechanics with results validated through member checking. Results. Findings included different choices of game attritubes and game elements in courses in middle school, high school, and higher education. Teacher selection and inclusion of game mechanics changed over time to better meet the needs of students. Conclusions. The structure of game-based learning at different levels will vary to meet the developmental and academic needs of students, but more work is needed in determining which strategies are most effective for learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Larysa Nadolny & Zina Alaswad & Dennis Culver & Wei Wang, 2017. "Designing With Game-Based Learning: Game Mechanics From Middle School to Higher Education," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 48(6), pages 814-831, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:48:y:2017:i:6:p:814-831
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878117736893
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878117736893
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878117736893?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robson, Karen & Plangger, Kirk & Kietzmann, Jan H. & McCarthy, Ian & Pitt, Leyland, 2016. "Game on: Engaging customers and employees through gamification," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 29-36.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sarki Din Sarki & Lydia Kwari & Bwirdimma Dugul Gotep & Mary Dickson Dikop & Iliya Gushi & Gakbish John Gagara & Golji Geoffrey Gopep & Yilleng Augustine Mwagitdang & Atang I. Toma & Awuya Michael Ali, 2025. "Effects of Game-Based Instructional Strategy on Senior Secondary Students’ Interest and Achievement in Probability in Pankshin Local Government Area of Plateau State, Nigeria," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(3s), pages 3415-3426, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yongzhong Yang & Aixian Yu & Jinjing Li & Mohsin Shafi & Linling Zhong, 2025. "Would You Like to Share? The Influence of Gamification in the Virtual Learning Community," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(3), pages 11643-11672, September.
    2. Qi, Ji (Miracle) & Wang, Sijun & Lindsey Hall, Kristina K., 2023. "Bridging employee engagement and customer engagement in a service context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    3. Zhuoyao Cui & Haochen Yang, 2023. "From Game Elements to Active Learning Intentions: Exploring the Driving Factors in Digital Learning Platforms," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    4. Melanie B. Richards & Karin L. Becker & Jessica Stollings-Holder, 2024. "Escaping generational conflict: using gamification to examine intergenerational communication & problem-solving," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(6), pages 1597-1616, June.
    5. Behl, Abhishek & Jayawardena, Nirma & Ishizaka, Alessio & Gupta, Manish & Shankar, Amit, 2022. "Gamification and gigification: A multidimensional theoretical approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1378-1393.
    6. Enoch Kwame Tham-Agyekum & Fred Ankuyi & John-Eudes Andivi Bakang, 2025. "Gamification in Agricultural Extension: A Review of Impact, Challenges, and Emerging Opportunities," Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development Studies, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Doctoral Field Engineering and Management in Agriculture and Rural Development, issue 4, pages 171-188.
    7. Feng, Wenting & Tu, Rungting & Hsieh, Peishan, 2020. "Can gamification increases consumers’ engagement in fitness apps? The moderating role of commensurability of the game elements," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    8. Xi, Nannan & Hamari, Juho, 2020. "Does gamification affect brand engagement and equity? A study in online brand communities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 449-460.
    9. Poncin, Ingrid & Garnier, Marion & Ben Mimoun, Mohammed Slim & Leclercq, Thomas, 2017. "Smart technologies and shopping experience: Are gamification interfaces effective? The case of the Smartstore," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 320-331.
    10. Andrea Stevenson Thorpe & Stephen Roper, 2019. "The Ethics of Gamification in a Marketing Context," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(2), pages 597-609, March.
    11. Zhou, Fei & Lin, Youhai & Mou, Jian & Cohen, Jason & Chen, Sihua, 2023. "Understanding the dark side of gamified interactions on short-form video platforms: Through a lens of expectations violations theory," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PB).
    12. João M. Lopes & Sofia Gomes & Ivo Rodrigues, 2024. "Playing the gamification and co-creation game: a bibliometric literature review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(1), pages 353-376, February.
    13. Sharma, Wamika & Lim, Weng Marc & Kumar, Satish & Verma, Aastha & Kumra, Rajeev, 2024. "Game on! A state-of-the-art overview of doing business with gamification," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    14. Abhishek Behl & Nirma Jayawardena & Vijay Pereira & Fauzia Jabeen & Kokil Jain & Manish Gupta, 2025. "Engaging and motivating crowd-workers in gamified crowdsourcing mobile apps in the context of logistics and sustainable supply chain management," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 355(2), pages 2279-2309, December.
    15. Täuscher, Karl, 2017. "Leveraging collective intelligence: How to design and manage crowd-based business models," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 237-245.
    16. Saima Hussain & Sara Qazi & Rizwan Raheem Ahmed & Dalia Streimikiene & Jolita Vveinhardt, 2018. "Employees Management: Evidence from Gamification Techniques," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 14(4), pages 97-107.
    17. Bitrián, Paula & Buil, Isabel & Catalán, Sara, 2021. "Enhancing user engagement: The role of gamification in mobile apps," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 170-185.
    18. Friedrich, Julia & Becker, Michael & Kramer, Frederik & Wirth, Markus & Schneider, Martin, 2020. "Incentive design and gamification for knowledge management," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 341-352.
    19. Hengky Salim & Rodney Anthony Stewart & Oz Sahin & Birthe Sagstad & Michael Dudley, 2021. "R3SOLVE: A Serious Game to Support End-of-Life Rooftop Solar Panel Waste Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-20, November.
    20. Xi, Nannan & Hamari, Juho, 2019. "Does gamification satisfy needs? A study on the relationship between gamification features and intrinsic need satisfaction," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 210-221.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:48:y:2017:i:6:p:814-831. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.