IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v9y2019i3p2158244019861495.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Work–Family Conflict Scale: Psychometric Properties of the Italian Version

Author

Listed:
  • Yura Loscalzo
  • Rosalba Raffagnino
  • Claudia Gonnelli
  • Marco Giannini

Abstract

In literature, there are many instruments for measuring the work–family conflict (W-F-C). The Work–Family Conflict Scale (WFCS) is one of the most used tools. This study aimed to evaluate its psychometric properties on a sample of 684 Italian workers (42.1% males, 57.9% females, mean age = 45.51 ± 10.91). We also evaluated if there were some demographic differences in the W-F-C, with relation to gender, the presence of children, and the kind of job (i.e., medical doctors and other health professionals, teachers and researchers, employees, manual workers, self-employed workers). We found that the Italian WFCS has good psychometric properties. Moreover, contrary to our hypotheses, males experience higher W-F-C than females, and the lowest level of W-F-C characterize doctors and other health professionals. Manual workers and self-employed workers seem to be the two job categories that experience the highest level of W-F-C.

Suggested Citation

  • Yura Loscalzo & Rosalba Raffagnino & Claudia Gonnelli & Marco Giannini, 2019. "Work–Family Conflict Scale: Psychometric Properties of the Italian Version," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(3), pages 21582440198, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:9:y:2019:i:3:p:2158244019861495
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244019861495
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244019861495
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244019861495?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huiping Zhang & Paul Yip & Peilian Chi & Kinsun Chan & Yee Cheung & Xiulan Zhang, 2012. "Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties of the Work-Family Balance Scale in an Urban Chinese Sample," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 105(3), pages 409-418, February.
    2. David Maume & Rachel Sebastian, 2012. "Gender, Nonstandard Work Schedules, and Marital Quality," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 477-490, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thorsten Konietzko, 2015. "Self-Employed Individuals, Time Use, and Earnings," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 64-83, March.
    2. Kaylene J. Fellows & Hsin-Yao Chiu & E. Jeffrey Hill & Alan J. Hawkins, 2016. "Work–Family Conflict and Couple Relationship Quality: A Meta-analytic Study," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 509-518, December.
    3. Sarika Jain & Shreekumar K. Nair, 2017. "Work Support and Family Support as Predictors of Work-to-family Enrichment and Family-to-work Enrichment," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 18(5), pages 1307-1324, October.
    4. Leizhou Zhu & Yaping Huang, 2022. "A Framework for Analyzing the Family Urbanization of China from a “Culture–Institution” Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, November.
    5. Jose Maria Fernandez-Crehuet & J. Ignacio Gimenez-Nadal & Luisa Eugenia Reyes Recio, 2016. "The National Work–Life Balance Index©: The European Case," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 128(1), pages 341-359, August.
    6. Pollmann-Schult, Matthias & Li, Jianghong, 2020. "Introduction to the Special Issue "Parental work and family/child well-being" [Einführung in das Sonderheft „Elterliche Arbeit und Familien-/Kinderwohlbefinden“]," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 32(2), pages 177-191.
    7. Gracia, Pablo & Han, Wen-Jui & Li, Jianghong, 2021. "Nonstandard Work Schedules in Cross-National Perspective: A Study of 29 European Countries, 2005-2015," SocArXiv mz53c, Center for Open Science.
    8. Karen Leppel, 2015. "The Method of Generalized Ordered Probit with Selectivity: Application to Marital Happiness," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 451-461, September.
    9. Mary Katras & Erin Sharp & Elizabeth Dolan & Laura Baron, 2015. "Non-standard Work and Rural Low-Income Mothers: Making It Work," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 84-96, March.
    10. Krista Minnotte & Michael Minnotte & Jordan Bonstrom, 2015. "Work–Family Conflicts and Marital Satisfaction Among US Workers: Does Stress Amplification Matter?," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 21-33, March.
    11. Li, Jianghong & Johnson, Sarah E. & Han, Wen-Jui & Andrews, Sonia & Kendall, Garth & Strazdins, Lyndall & Dockery, Alfred, 2014. "Parents' Nonstandard Work Schedules and Child Well-Being: A Critical Review of the Literature," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 35(1), pages 53-73.
    12. Samantha Haussmann & André Braz Golgher, 2016. "Shrinking gender wage gaps in the Brazilian labor market: an application of the APC approach [Shrinking gender wage gaps in the Brazilian labor market: an application of the APC approach]," Nova Economia, Economics Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Brazil), vol. 26(2), pages 429-464, May-Augus.
    13. Vikram Singh Chouhan, 2022. "Influence of Career Adaptability on Career Satisfaction and Turnover Intention of IT Professionals," International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals (IJHCITP), IGI Global, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, January.
    14. Elizabeth Dolan & Elena Stancanelli, 2021. "Women’s Employment, Wages, and the Household," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 101-106, July.
    15. Elizabeth Horner, 2014. "Continued Pursuit of Happily Ever After: Low Barriers to Divorce and Happiness," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 228-240, June.
    16. Daphne Pedersen, 2015. "Work Characteristics and the Preventive Health Behaviors and Subjective Health of Married Parents with Preschool Age Children," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 48-63, March.
    17. Guo Yu (Samuel) Soon & Khoon Kiat Tan & Wenru Wang & Violeta Lopez, 2015. "Back to the beginning: Perceptions of older Singaporean couples living alone," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), pages 402-407, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:9:y:2019:i:3:p:2158244019861495. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.