IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v6y2016i4p2158244016678911.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Editorial for Special Edition, Digital Representations

Author

Listed:
  • Louise Corti
  • Nigel Fielding
  • Libby Bishop

Abstract

This collection of papers comprises five contributions with a social science or social historical perspective that present the current state of the art in the field of re-using and publishing digital qualitative data. The articles address the use of digital sources in qualitative research in both research and teaching, charting types of use over the past 10 years, and looking forward to emerging practices and methods, such as the promise and potential that technological innovations can bring to enable new ways of presenting and publishing qualitative research. Some of the papers make use of direct linking allowing the reader to explore “live†data sources, offering an opportunity to see how research transparency might be operationalized in the presentation of qualitative findings and reporting. The papers reference major contributions to the literature and present stimulating debates on the topic and build on previously well-cited publications in which the editors have presented state-of-the-art articles on secondary analysis of qualitative data.

Suggested Citation

  • Louise Corti & Nigel Fielding & Libby Bishop, 2016. "Editorial for Special Edition, Digital Representations," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(4), pages 21582440166, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:6:y:2016:i:4:p:2158244016678911
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244016678911
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244016678911
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244016678911?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jane Elliott & Jon Lawrence, 2016. "The Emotional Economy of Unemployment," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(4), pages 21582440166, December.
    2. Louise Corti & Nigel Fielding, 2016. "Opportunities From the Digital Revolution," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(4), pages 21582440166, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Catalina Guerrero-Romera & Raquel Sánchez-Ibáñez & Ainoa Escribano-Miralles & Verónica Vivas-Moreno, 2021. "Active teachers’ perceptions on the most suitable resources for teaching history," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-8, December.
    2. Kahryn Hughes & Jason Hughes & Anna Tarrant, 2022. "Working at a remove: continuous, collective, and configurative approaches to qualitative secondary analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 375-394, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Louise Corti & Nigel Fielding, 2016. "Opportunities From the Digital Revolution," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(4), pages 21582440166, November.
    2. Maureen Haaker & Bethany Morgan-Brett, 2017. "Developing Research-Led Teaching: Two Cases of Practical Data Reuse in the Classroom," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(2), pages 21582440177, April.
    3. Raffael Heiss & Desirée Schmuck & Jörg Matthes & Carolin Eicher, 2021. "Citizen Science in Schools: Predictors and Outcomes of Participating in Voluntary Political Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    4. Doris Bambey & Louise Corti & Michael Diepenbroek & Heidemarie Hanekop & Betina Hollstein & Sabine Imeri & Hubert Knoblauch & Susanne Kretzer & Christian Meier zu Verl & Christian Meyer & Alexia Meyer, 2018. "Archivierung und Zugang zu Qualitativen Daten," RatSWD Working Papers 267, German Data Forum (RatSWD).
    5. Emily Namey & Greg Guest & Amy O’Regan & Christine L. Godwin & Jamilah Taylor & Andres Martinez, 2022. "How does qualitative data collection modality affect disclosure of sensitive information and participant experience? Findings from a quasi-experimental study," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 2341-2360, August.
    6. Simone Belli & Ernesto Ponsot, 2022. "Liquid Science and Digital Transformation: How Knowledge between Researchers Flows in Their Scientific Networks," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:6:y:2016:i:4:p:2158244016678911. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.