IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i3p21582440251366012.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Regulation and Corporate Greening Governance: New Evidence Based on the Distance Between Enterprises and Environmental Protection Bureaus

Author

Listed:
  • Bin Wang
  • Xuejing Liu
  • Bo Li
  • Daqian Shi

Abstract

Ecological and environmental protection has become a crucial component and key indicator of high-quality economic development. Strengthening corporate greening governance is a key focus area for regulators aiming to enhance the reform of a modernized environmental governance system. This paper examines a sample of A-share listed companies in China from 2009 to 2021, focusing on the impact of geographical distance between enterprises and Environmental Protection Bureaus(EPBs) on corporate greenwashing, which is grounded in the frameworks of government-enterprise collusion and proactive government regulation. Empirical tests show that the closer an enterprise is to the Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau, the greater the degree of corporate greenwashing, which supports the dominant role of the “distance decay effect†of government-enterprise collusion. The conclusion remains robust after considering endogeneity issues. Mechanism tests show that the government-enterprise collusion effect is the main pathway through which environmental regulatory distance affects corporate greenwashing, and that the effect is most significant at the national, provincial, and district levels of political affiliation. We also find that this relationship varies across regions, industries, and types of enterprises. Specifically, it is more pronounced among enterprises located in non-eastern regions, those in non-provincial capitals and non-sub-provincial cities, enterprises with low industry concentration, and enterprises that are not yet mature. Meanwhile, media attention, shareholder monitoring, government environmental concerns, and network infrastructure construction have moderating effects on it. This paper enriches the influencing factors of corporate greenwashing from the perspectives of geo-economics and public economics. It offers new empirical evidence supporting “the distance decay effect†and provides decision-making guidance for the government in implementing environmental protection regulations. JEL Classification: Q52, Q56, Q58.

Suggested Citation

  • Bin Wang & Xuejing Liu & Bo Li & Daqian Shi, 2025. "Environmental Regulation and Corporate Greening Governance: New Evidence Based on the Distance Between Enterprises and Environmental Protection Bureaus," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251366012
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251366012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251366012
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251366012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q52 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Pollution Control Adoption and Costs; Distributional Effects; Employment Effects
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251366012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.