IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i2p21582440251342509.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rethinking Internalization Theory due to Coase’s “Hidden in Plain Sight†Assumption

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Dansky
  • B. Andrew Cudmore
  • Amitabh S. Dutta

Abstract

Coase assumed that firms only use balance-sheet financing for their capital investments. Other forms of financing exist, and as shown, the process by which economic utility theory gets applied to Internalization Theory is found to be contingent on the method of financing. Coase’s underlying financing assumption causes the long-standing Investment Opportunity Schedule (IOS) to yield erroneous results when applied to project-financed investments. This is significant because project financing is now a $200+ billion annual global market and widely used to finance electric power projects and numerous other capital-intensive investments. A new investment ranking mechanism (the MIOS) is proposed and shown to be the proper ranking mechanism for project-financed investment opportunities. Support is found for the new investment ranking mechanism using a paired comparison methodology which yields the ranking of the potential investments to be internalized as well as the placement of the equilibrium point. As shown, the Coasian IOS is not universal, but rather, is contingent on the method of financing. Thus, the answers to Coase’s two seminal questions which form the basis for Internalization Theory (Which business opportunities should be internalized by a firm?, and What should be the extent or boundary of a firm?) are also shown to be contingent on the method of financing. The IOS and the MIOS, working in tandem, provide a better foundation for Internalization Theory. JEL Codes : D21, D23, G31.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Dansky & B. Andrew Cudmore & Amitabh S. Dutta, 2025. "Rethinking Internalization Theory due to Coase’s “Hidden in Plain Sight†Assumption," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(2), pages 21582440251, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:21582440251342509
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251342509
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251342509
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251342509?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Coasian Investment opportunity schedule; internalization theory; paired comparison methodology; project financing;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D21 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Theory
    • D23 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Organizational Behavior; Transaction Costs; Property Rights
    • G31 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Capital Budgeting; Fixed Investment and Inventory Studies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:21582440251342509. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.