IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v12y2022i3p21582440221093040.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revising English Language Course Curriculum Among Graduate Students: An EAP Needs Analysis Study

Author

Listed:
  • Yan Song
  • Jing Zhou

Abstract

Although English for Academic Purposes (EAP) needs among undergraduate and graduate students in both English as a second language and English as a foreign language contexts have been widely researched, there is still a scarcity of research on the EAP needs of graduate students in less-developed parts of China. Adopting a mixed-methods approach (MMR) and collecting data through a questionnaire from student and teacher interviews, this study examined the views of graduate students at a public university in northwestern China on the importance of academic speaking, listening, reading, and writing skills. The study also examined the graduate students’ general perceptions of their English classes, and the problems they had with academic speaking, listening, reading, and writing. Additionally, students’ and teachers’ perspectives on EAP were compared and contrasted. The findings revealed that productive skills were rated as more important as compared to receptive skills. Furthermore, over 82% of the comments on their English classes were negative. Several important issues and specific pedagogical implications for curriculum design were discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan Song & Jing Zhou, 2022. "Revising English Language Course Curriculum Among Graduate Students: An EAP Needs Analysis Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:3:p:21582440221093040
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440221093040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440221093040
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440221093040?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zohreh Eslami, 2010. "Teachers’ Voice vs. Students’ Voice: A Needs Analysis Approach of English for Acadmic Purposes (EAP) in Iran," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 3(1), pages 1-3, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Feifei Wang & Xiaohui Geng & Jiying Han, 2024. "Chinese university EFL learners’ English for General Academic Purposes: relationships between target needs and self-efficacy," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cheng-Ji Lai, 2023. "Teacher-Student Interaction for English-Medium Instruction (EMI) Content and Language Learning and the Effects of Implementing Multimodal Input of Classroom Interaction: University Students’ Percept," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(1), pages 1-52, January.
    2. Homa Babai Shishavan, 2010. "The relationship between Iranian English language Teachers’ and Learners’ Gender and their Perceptions of an Effective English Language Teacher," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 3(3), pages 1-3, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:3:p:21582440221093040. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.