IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v12y2022i2p21582440221104815.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Factors That Influence College Students’ Academic Self-Efficacy in Blended Learning: A Study From the Personal, Interpersonal, and Environmental Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Yitong Wei
  • Yinghui Shi
  • Jason MacLeod
  • Harrison Hao Yang

Abstract

Academic self-efficacy is identified as one of the strongest predictors of students’ academic performance. However, few studies have explored the factors that influence students’ academic self-efficacy in a blended learning environment. By developing a comprehensive model, this study investigates the main factors that influence students’ academic self-efficacy in blended learning from the personal, interpersonal, and environmental perspectives. The relevant information was acquired through a questionnaire survey. The participants included 366 college students at a university in central China. Hierarchical regression analysis shows that intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, instructor support, performance expectancy, and facilitating conditions are significant predictors of students’ academic self-efficacy in blended learning. The findings expand the understanding of students’ academic self-efficacy in technology-enhanced learning environments and provide valuable insights that could help to improve the appropriateness of instructional design in blended learning courses.

Suggested Citation

  • Yitong Wei & Yinghui Shi & Jason MacLeod & Harrison Hao Yang, 2022. "Exploring the Factors That Influence College Students’ Academic Self-Efficacy in Blended Learning: A Study From the Personal, Interpersonal, and Environmental Perspectives," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:21582440221104815
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440221104815
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440221104815
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440221104815?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Ling & Peng, Zhenfei & Lu, Liucun & Liao, Huan & Li, Hui, 2020. "Peer relationships, self-efficacy, academic motivation, and mathematics achievement in Zhuang adolescents: A moderated mediation model," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    2. Datu, Jesus Alfonso D. & Yuen, Mantak, 2020. "Students’ connectedness is linked to higher gratitude and self-efficacy outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Datu, Jesus Alfonso D. & Jose Mateo, Nino, 2020. "Character strengths, academic self-efficacy, and well-being outcomes in the Philippines: A longitudinal study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    2. Lai, Angel Hor Yan & Chui, Cheryl Hiu-kwan & Wong, Jade Kin Yu & Leung, Cynthia Tsz Ching & Chen, Zhijun, 2022. "Ethnic identity, perceived classmate support and general self-efficacy in ethnic minority adolescents in rural Chinese school settings," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    3. Jesús de la Fuente & Erika Andrea Malpica-Chavarria & Angélica Garzón-Umerenkova & Mónica Pachón-Basallo, 2021. "Effect of Personal and Contextual Factors of Regulation on Academic Achievement during Adolescence: The Role of Gender and Age," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-18, August.
    4. Xie, Xiaochun & Guo, Qingtong & Wang, Pengcheng, 2021. "Childhood parental neglect and adolescent internet gaming disorder: From the perspective of a distal—proximal—process—outcome model," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:21582440221104815. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.