IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v11y2021i1p21582440211004172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trump and Muslims: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Islamophobic Rhetoric in Donald Trump’s Selected Tweets

Author

Listed:
  • Mohsin Hassan Khan
  • Farwa Qazalbash
  • Hamedi Mohd Adnan
  • Lalu Nurul Yaqin
  • Rashid Ali Khuhro

Abstract

The emergence of Donald Trump as an anti-Muslim-Islam presidential candidate and victory over Hillary Clinton is an issue of debate and division in the United States’ political sphere. Many commentators and political pundits criticize Trump for his disparaging rhetoric on Twitter and present him as an example of how Twitter can be an effective tool for the construction and extension of political polarization. The current study analyzes the selected tweets by Donald Trump posted on Twitter to unmask how he uses language to construct Islamophobic discourse structures and attempts to form his ideological structures along with. The researchers hypothesize that Islamophobia is a marked feature of Trump’s political career realized by specific rhetorical and discursive devices. Therefore, the study purposively takes 40 most controversial tweets of Donald Trump against Islam and Muslims and carried out a critical discourse analysis with the help of macro-strategies of the discourse given by Wodak and Meyer and van Dijk’s referential strategies of political discourse. The findings reveal that Trump uses language rhetorically to exclude people of different ethnic identities, especially Muslims, through demagogic language to create a difference of “us†vs. “them†and making in this way “America Great Again†.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohsin Hassan Khan & Farwa Qazalbash & Hamedi Mohd Adnan & Lalu Nurul Yaqin & Rashid Ali Khuhro, 2021. "Trump and Muslims: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Islamophobic Rhetoric in Donald Trump’s Selected Tweets," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440211, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:21582440211004172
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440211004172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440211004172
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440211004172?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elham Kadkhodaee & Zeinab Ghasemi Tari, 2019. "Otherising Iran in American political discourse: case study of a post-JCPOA senate hearing on Iran sanctions," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(1), pages 109-128, January.
    2. Muhammad Junaid Ghauri & Salma Umber, 2019. "Exploring the Nature of Representation of Islam and Muslims in the Australian Press," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(4), pages 21582440198, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Evan W. Sandlin & Daniel J. Simmons, 2022. "Unworthy victims and threatening adversaries: Islam, Muslims, and U.S. foreign policy," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 103(5), pages 1019-1031, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:21582440211004172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.