IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v238y2024i1p172-192.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on the reliability of accident analysis results: Taking two groups of four accident analysis references with the 24Model as samples

Author

Listed:
  • Qingsong Jia
  • Gui Fu
  • Xuecai Xie
  • Shihan Hu
  • Yuxin Wang
  • Qian Lyu

Abstract

Accident prevention depends on accident analysis. In order to improve the reliability of accident analysis and find the common problems related to reliability in accident analysis, two groups of four papers of master’s and doctor’s theses which applied 24Model to analysis coal mine gas explosion accident were selected as samples. The unsafe act results obtained from the analysis are compared. The results show a low consistency level, which reflects that the reliability of the output needs to be improved. Through analysis, the inconsistency of details in causes description, the difficulty in the cause description and the omission of unsafe acts are the main reasons leading to the above situation. In order to standardize the description of cause items, the components of unsafe acts were defined as “premise + action†, and seven types of premises were summarized to judge unsafe acts. In order to improve the efficiency and reliability of accident analysis, it is suggested that the current data should be taken as reference, and the taxonomy based on consequences should be established to unify unsafe act detail description level, and the corresponding computer software should be developed to assist accident analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Qingsong Jia & Gui Fu & Xuecai Xie & Shihan Hu & Yuxin Wang & Qian Lyu, 2024. "Study on the reliability of accident analysis results: Taking two groups of four accident analysis references with the 24Model as samples," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 238(1), pages 172-192, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:238:y:2024:i:1:p:172-192
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X221128870
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X221128870
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X221128870?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wu, Chao & Huang, Lang, 2019. "A new accident causation model based on information flow and its application in Tianjin Port fire and explosion accident," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 73-85.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huimin Guo & Shugang Li & Lianhua Cheng, 2022. "Research on the Causes of Gas Explosion Accidents Based on Safety Information Transmission," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-13, August.
    2. Tan, Samson & Moinuddin, Khalid, 2019. "Systematic review of human and organizational risks for probabilistic risk analysis in high-rise buildings," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 233-250.
    3. Albert P. C. Chan & Junfeng Guan & Tracy N. Y. Choi & Yang Yang & Guangdong Wu & Edmond Lam, 2023. "Improving Safety Performance of Construction Workers through Learning from Incidents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-26, March.
    4. Guirong Zhang & Wei Feng & Yu Lei, 2022. "Human Factor Analysis (HFA) Based on a Complex Network and Its Application in Gas Explosion Accidents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Chen, Yuanjiang & Feng, Wei & Jiang, Zhiqiang & Duan, Lingling & Cheng, Shuangyi, 2021. "An accident causation model based on safety information cognition and its application," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    6. Li, Xin & Chen, Chao & Hong, Yi-du & Yang, Fu-qiang, 2023. "Exploring hazardous chemical explosion accidents with association rules and Bayesian networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:238:y:2024:i:1:p:172-192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.