IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v234y2020i4p579-587.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A censored sequential posterior odd test method in testability demonstration test planning

Author

Listed:
  • Yong Zhang
  • Chao Wang
  • Xin Lin
  • Guanjun Liu
  • Peng Yang
  • Jing Qiu

Abstract

Testability demonstration tests can effectively verify product capabilities of fault detection and isolation; however, they suffer from insufficient samples, long cycles and high costs due to destructiveness of fault injection tests, which leads to an increasing demand for small sample tests. The sequential posterior odd test can effectively reduce sample sizes, but test results can be random and the sample size may be large. In this article, a censored sequential posterior odd test method is proposed, which can control the incremental risk caused by forced censoring within a contracted range by risk splitting. The development process of the testability demonstration test based on the censored sequential posterior odd test is designed. The number of censored tests and the calculation method of the censored threshold are presented. The case application shows that with the same prior distribution and constraint parameters, the average sample size of the proposed method is smaller than that of the sequential posterior odd test and of the classical method considering risks for both producers and consumers. The presented method can further reduce the risk of misjudgment and the number of test samples, contributing to the reduction of the test cycle and costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Yong Zhang & Chao Wang & Xin Lin & Guanjun Liu & Peng Yang & Jing Qiu, 2020. "A censored sequential posterior odd test method in testability demonstration test planning," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(4), pages 579-587, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:234:y:2020:i:4:p:579-587
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X20918791
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X20918791
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X20918791?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:234:y:2020:i:4:p:579-587. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.