IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

How Well Are We Measuring Workers’ Rights?

Listed author(s):
  • L. Josh Bivens

    (Economic Policy Institute, 1660 L Street NW, Suite 1200, Washington, DC 20036, USA,

  • Adam S. Hersh

    (University of Massachusetts-Amherst, Department of Economics, Amherst, MA 01003, USA,

  • Christian E. Weller

    (Center for American Progress, 1333 H Street NW, 10th Floor, Washington, DC 20005, USA,

The literature overwhelmingly supports the proposition that high-quality domestic institutions are a precondition for economic growth. Political freedoms have been shown to contribute to this institutional quality. A smaller literature suggests that the adoption and enforcement of core labor standards (CLS) that protect the rights of workers can be an important boon for economic development. This article aims to lay a stronger groundwork for the literature linking workers’ rights and economic outcomes by examining more closely some of the proxies that have been used to measure these rights. Our results suggest that the ratification of CLS is only weakly correlated with the improvement of broader political freedoms. The figures also show some link between CLS ratification and proxies for actual rights enjoyed by workers.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Union for Radical Political Economics in its journal Review of Radical Political Economics.

Volume (Year): 37 (2005)
Issue (Month): 3 (September)
Pages: 302-310

in new window

Handle: RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:37:y:2005:i:3:p:302-310
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:37:y:2005:i:3:p:302-310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (SAGE Publications)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.