IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/reorpe/v16y1984i2-3p81-94.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rethinking Scarcity: Neoclassicism, NeoMalthusianism, and NeoManrsm

Author

Listed:
  • Julie Matthaei

    (Department of Economics, Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA 02181)

Abstract

Neoclassical economic theory holds that scarcity is the inevitable and central economic problem, to which our present "free market economy" provides the optimal solution. Recently, this claim has been challenged by neoMathusians associated with the Zero Population Growth and Ecology movements, who argue that our practice of continued economic growth is inconsistent with the reality of scarcity. While the neoMalthusians have provided the basis of a critique both of neoclassical theory and of our present economic system, their acceptance of the neoclassical view of scarcity has prevented them from developing an adequate theory of their own. To understand scarcity, we must move our focus away from the relationship between people and resources and center on the social relationships which constitute the core of economic life. NeoMarxian theory provides the basis for such analysis; it can be used to show that while advanced capitalism has institutionalized scarcity, it has also developed the means for its eradication.

Suggested Citation

  • Julie Matthaei, 1984. "Rethinking Scarcity: Neoclassicism, NeoMalthusianism, and NeoManrsm," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 16(2-3), pages 81-94, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:16:y:1984:i:2-3:p:81-94
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rrp.sagepub.com/content/16/2-3/81.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daoud, Adel, 2018. "Unifying Studies of Scarcity, Abundance, and Sufficiency," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 208-217.
    2. Frederic Lee & Tae-Hee Jo, 2011. "Social Surplus Approach and Heterodox Economics," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(4), pages 857-876.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:16:y:1984:i:2-3:p:81-94. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.urpe.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.