IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v50y2022i1p84-116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Teacher Unions, Political Machines, and the Thorny Politics of Education Reform in Latin America

Author

Listed:
  • Ben Ross Schneider

Abstract

Existing research on developing countries emphasizes the decisive power of teacher unions in education politics. Yet that power varies, and a full understanding of the roots of union power and the sources of cross-national variation requires deeper analysis of organizational dynamics within unions. This analysis supports four arguments. First, teachers have a range of advantages in overcoming obstacles to collective action. Second, unions are not all alike; they vary widely, from interest groups (in Chile, Brazil, and Peru) to powerful political machines (in Mexico and Ecuador). Third, the source of this variation lies in factors (e.g., influence over teacher hiring) that shift power within unions from members to leaders in political-machine unions. Fourth, analyzing the dimensions of variation helps explain the different outcomes of recent reforms to teacher careers in Latin America, especially in highlighting the staunch opposition from political-machine unions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ben Ross Schneider, 2022. "Teacher Unions, Political Machines, and the Thorny Politics of Education Reform in Latin America," Politics & Society, , vol. 50(1), pages 84-116, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:50:y:2022:i:1:p:84-116
    DOI: 10.1177/00323292211002788
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00323292211002788
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00323292211002788?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:50:y:2022:i:1:p:84-116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.