IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/niesru/v180y2002i1p96-108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

EMU, Investment and Growth: Some Unresolved Issues

Author

Listed:
  • Nigel Pain

    (National Institute of Economic and Social Research, n.pain@niesr.ac.uk)

Abstract

At the heart of the evaluation of the economic costs and benefits of adopting the euro lies the question of whether living standards would be higher outside or inside the Euro Area. It is well established that there is a strong positive relationship between openness to international trade and investment and the performance of the UK economy. European integration is continuing to help raise the openness of the UK economy, as well as stimulating product market competition and making the UK a more attractive location for mobile investments. This provides an additional channel through which potential output in the UK is linked to the degree of integration with the rest of Europe. Adopting a common currency may bring modest further gains to productivity and living standards by stimulating trade as well as competition. Reducing exchange rate volatility may also raise the level of fixed capital investment in the UK, although the direct evidence for this is limited, and stimulate inward investment from outside Europe, but could reduce the level of foreign direct investment between the UK and the Euro Area. However it is far from clear how big the net benefits might be or how soon they might start to appear. If the UK were to enter monetary union at a significantly overvalued real exchange rate the gains might never materialise at all and there could easily be significant net losses.

Suggested Citation

  • Nigel Pain, 2002. "EMU, Investment and Growth: Some Unresolved Issues," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 180(1), pages 96-108, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:niesru:v:180:y:2002:i:1:p:96-108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ner.sagepub.com/content/180/1/96.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. International Monetary Fund, 2004. "United Kingdom: Selected Issues," IMF Staff Country Reports 2004/055, International Monetary Fund.
    2. Rademacher, Inga, 2013. "Tax competition in the eurozone: Capital mobility, agglomeration, and the small country disadvantage," MPIfG Discussion Paper 13/13, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    3. Mr. Carlo Cottarelli & Mr. Julio Escolano, 2004. "Assessing the Assessment: A Critical Look At the June 2003 Assessment of the United Kingdom'S Five Tests for Euro Entry," IMF Working Papers 2004/116, International Monetary Fund.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:niesru:v:180:y:2002:i:1:p:96-108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/niesruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.