IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v46y2026i3p355-370.html

Machine Learning for Intensive Care Unit Length-of-Stay Prediction: A Simulation-Based Approach to Bed Capacity Management

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Garber

    (Department of Statistics and Data Science, Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
    Centre for Interdisciplinary Health Research, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany)

  • Yarema Okhrin

    (Department of Statistics and Data Science, Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
    Department of Economics and Statistics, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden)

Abstract

Background While machine learning (ML) models are increasingly used to predict outcomes in health care, their practical effect on health care operations, such as bed capacity management, remains underexplored. There is a variety of traditionally used evaluation metrics to analyze ML models; however, decision makers in health care settings require a deeper understanding of their implications for resource management. Traditional performance measures often fail to provide this practical insight. Methods In this work, we conduct a simulation study to evaluate the impact of ML-driven length-of-stay (LOS) predictions on intensive care unit (ICU) bed capacity management. Two classification models differing in terms of explainability and interpretability, logistic regression (LR) and extreme gradient boosting (XGB), are applied to predict ICU-LOS. We use the HiRID dataset containing high-frequency data of more than 33,000 patients. The predictions of the ML models are integrated into a simulation framework that replicates real-world ICU bed management, allowing for the assessment of the practical implications of using these algorithms in a clinical setting. Results The application of both classification models results in improved capacity control regarding the key performance indicators in the simulation study, with XGB outperforming LR. While LR leads to slight overoccupancy in the ICU, slight underoccupancy can be observed when XGB is applied. Conclusion Our study bridges the gap between predictive accuracy and practical application by emphasizing the importance of evaluating ML models within the context of ICU capacity management. The simulation-based approach offers a more relevant assessment for health care practitioners, providing actionable insights that go beyond classical performance measures and directly address the needs of decision makers in clinical practice. Highlights We apply multiple classification models for ICU-LOS prediction using time-series data. This approach enables an update of the initial prediction resulting in the possibility of efficiently managing intensive care capacities. We present a simulation-based approach to evaluate ML algorithms and their impact on bed capacity management in real-world clinical settings. Our work provides in-depth insights into the impact of using ML techniques as decision support systems in the ICU and can lead to increased acceptance in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Garber & Yarema Okhrin, 2026. "Machine Learning for Intensive Care Unit Length-of-Stay Prediction: A Simulation-Based Approach to Bed Capacity Management," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 46(3), pages 355-370, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:46:y:2026:i:3:p:355-370
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X251406639
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X251406639
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X251406639?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew J. Vickers & Elena B. Elkin, 2006. "Decision Curve Analysis: A Novel Method for Evaluating Prediction Models," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 26(6), pages 565-574, November.
    2. Fermín Mallor & Cristina Azcárate, 2014. "Combining optimization with simulation to obtain credible models for intensive care units," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 221(1), pages 255-271, October.
    3. repec:plo:pone00:0145395 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ja Hyeon Ku & Myong Kim & Seok-Soo Byun & Hyeon Jeong & Cheol Kwak & Hyeon Hoe Kim & Sang Eun Lee, 2015. "External Validation of Models for Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis in Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-10, October.
    2. Félix L. Morales & Feihong Xu & Hyojun Ada Lee & Helio Tejedor Navarro & Meagan A. Bechel & Eryn L. Cameron & Jesse Kelso & Curtis H. Weiss & Luís A. Nunes Amaral, 2025. "Open-source computational pipeline flags instances of acute respiratory distress syndrome in mechanically ventilated adult patients," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Jaime González & Juan-Carlos Ferrer & Alejandro Cataldo & Luis Rojas, 2019. "A proactive transfer policy for critical patient flow management," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 287-303, June.
    4. Lin Lu & Laurent Dercle & Binsheng Zhao & Lawrence H. Schwartz, 2021. "Deep learning for the prediction of early on-treatment response in metastatic colorectal cancer from serial medical imaging," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Camila Ramos & Alejandro Cataldo & Juan–Carlos Ferrer, 2020. "Appointment and patient scheduling in chemotherapy: a case study in Chilean hospitals," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 286(1), pages 411-439, March.
    6. Rawan Omar & Sooyun Caroline Tavolacci & Lathan Liou & Dillan F Villavisanis & Yoav Y Broza & Hossam Haick, 2024. "Real-time prognostic biomarkers for predicting in-hospital mortality and cardiac complications in COVID-19 patients," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(3), pages 1-17, March.
    7. Yiwang Zhou & Peter X.K. Song & Haoda Fu, 2021. "Net benefit index: Assessing the influence of a biomarker for individualized treatment rules," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(4), pages 1254-1264, December.
    8. Konstantina Chalkou & Andrew J. Vickers & Fabio Pellegrini & Andrea Manca & Georgia Salanti, 2023. "Decision Curve Analysis for Personalized Treatment Choice between Multiple Options," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 43(3), pages 337-349, April.
    9. Mohsen Sadatsafavi & Andrew J. Vickers & Tae Yoon Lee & Paul Gustafson & Laure Wynants, 2025. "Expected Value of Sample Information Calculations for Risk Prediction Model Validation," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 45(3), pages 232-244, April.
    10. Thibaut Vaulet & Priyanka Koshy & Karolien Wellekens & Olivier Aubert & Charlotte Bottomley & Jasper Callemeyn & Evert Cleenders & Maarten Coemans & Lynn Cornell & Aiko P. J. de Vries & Gillian Divard, 2025. "Continuous indices to assess the phenotypic spectrum of kidney transplant rejection," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Adam Maidman & Lan Wang, 2018. "New semiparametric method for predicting high‐cost patients," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(3), pages 1104-1111, September.
    12. repec:plo:pmed00:1002019 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Mehmet Eren Ahsen & Mehmet U. S. Ayvaci & Radha Mookerjee & Gustavo Stolovitzky, 2025. "Economics of AI and human task sharing for decision making in screening mammography," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-10, December.
    14. Dexin Chen & Meiting Fu & Liangjie Chi & Liyan Lin & Jiaxin Cheng & Weisong Xue & Chenyan Long & Wei Jiang & Xiaoyu Dong & Jian Sui & Dajia Lin & Jianping Lu & Shuangmu Zhuo & Side Liu & Guoxin Li & G, 2022. "Prognostic and predictive value of a pathomics signature in gastric cancer," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    15. Jing Sun & Yue Liu & Jianhui Zhao & Bin Lu & Siyun Zhou & Wei Lu & Jingsun Wei & Yeting Hu & Xiangxing Kong & Junshun Gao & Hong Guan & Junli Gao & Qian Xiao & Xue Li, 2024. "Plasma proteomic and polygenic profiling improve risk stratification and personalized screening for colorectal cancer," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.
    16. Mina Samieinasab & Seyed Ahmad Torabzadeh & Mahdi Hamid & Mohammad Sheikhalishahi, 2025. "Intensive care unit and ward beds, and human resources capacity planning in a cardiac surgical theater using a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making and simulation approach," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 16(7), pages 2387-2405, July.
    17. Anirudh Tomer & Daan Nieboer & Monique J. Roobol & Ewout W. Steyerberg & Dimitris Rizopoulos, 2019. "Personalized schedules for surveillance of low‐risk prostate cancer patients," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 75(1), pages 153-162, March.
    18. Bernd Lütkenhöner & Türker Basel, 2013. "Predictive Modeling for Diagnostic Tests with High Specificity, but Low Sensitivity: A Study of the Glycerol Test in Patients with Suspected Menière’s Disease," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-12, November.
    19. Shamil D. Cooray & Lihini A. Wijeyaratne & Georgia Soldatos & John Allotey & Jacqueline A. Boyle & Helena J. Teede, 2020. "The Unrealised Potential for Predicting Pregnancy Complications in Women with Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-20, April.
    20. Minta Thomas & Yu-Ru Su & Elisabeth A. Rosenthal & Lori C. Sakoda & Stephanie L. Schmit & Maria N. Timofeeva & Zhishan Chen & Ceres Fernandez-Rozadilla & Philip J. Law & Neil Murphy & Robert Carreras-, 2023. "Combining Asian and European genome-wide association studies of colorectal cancer improves risk prediction across racial and ethnic populations," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    21. Khushal Arjan & Lui G Forni & Richard M Venn & David Hunt & Luke Eliot Hodgson, 2021. "Clinical decision-making in older adults following emergency admission to hospital. Derivation and validation of a risk stratification score: OPERA," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-12, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:46:y:2026:i:3:p:355-370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.