IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v41y2021i5p505-514.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conflicting Goals Influence Physicians’ Expressed Beliefs to Patients and Colleagues

Author

Listed:
  • Siyuan Yin

    (Department of Marketing, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA)

  • Hal R. Arkes

    (Department of Psychology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
    The Harding Center for Risk Literacy, Berlin, Germany)

  • John P. McCoy

    (Department of Marketing, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA)

  • Margot E. Cohen

    (Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA)

  • Barbara A. Mellers

    (Department of Psychology and Department of Marketing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA)

Abstract

Background Physicians who communicate their prognostic beliefs to patients must balance candor against other competing goals, such as preserving hope, acknowledging the uncertainty of medicine, or motivating patients to follow their treatment regimes. Objective To explore possible differences between the beliefs physicians report as their own and those they express to patients and colleagues. Design An online panel of 398 specialists in internal medicine who completed their medical degrees and practiced in the United States provided their estimated diagnostic accuracy and prognostic assessments for a randomly assigned case. In addition, they reported the diagnostic and prognostic assessments they would report to patients and colleagues more generally. Physicians answered questions about how and why their own beliefs differed from their expressed beliefs to patients and colleagues in the specific case and more generally in their practice. Results When discussing beliefs about prognoses to patients and colleagues, most physicians expressed beliefs that differed from their own beliefs. Physicians were more likely to express greater optimism when talking to patients about poor prognoses than good prognoses. Physicians were also more likely to express greater uncertainty to patients when prognoses were poor than when they were good. The most common reasons for the differences between physicians’ own beliefs and their expressed beliefs were preserving hope and acknowledging the inherent uncertainty of medicine. Conclusion To balance candor against other communicative goals, physicians tended to express beliefs that were more optimistic and contained greater uncertainty than the beliefs they said were their own, especially in discussions with patients whose prognoses were poor.

Suggested Citation

  • Siyuan Yin & Hal R. Arkes & John P. McCoy & Margot E. Cohen & Barbara A. Mellers, 2021. "Conflicting Goals Influence Physicians’ Expressed Beliefs to Patients and Colleagues," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 41(5), pages 505-514, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:41:y:2021:i:5:p:505-514
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X211001841
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X211001841
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X211001841?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:41:y:2021:i:5:p:505-514. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.