IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v32y2012i1p145-153.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Divergent Intentions to Use Antibiotic Guidelines

Author

Listed:
  • Pieter-Jan Cortoos
  • Bert H. J. Schreurs
  • Willy E. Peetermans
  • Karel De Witte
  • Gert Laekeman

Abstract

Background . To improve physicians’ antimicrobial practice, it is important to identify barriers to and facilitators of guideline adherence and assess their relative importance. The theory of planned behavior permits such assessment and has been previously used for evaluating antibiotic use. According to this theory, guideline use is fueled by 3 factors: attitude, subjective norm (perceived social pressure regarding guidelines), and perceived behavioral control (PBC; perceived ability to follow the guideline). The authors aim to explore factors affecting guideline use in their hospital. Methods . Starting from their earlier observations, the authors constructed a questionnaire based on the theory of planned behavior, with an additional measure of habit strength. After pilot testing, the survey was distributed among physicians in a major teaching hospital. Results . Of 393 contacted physicians, 195 completed questionnaires were received (50.5% corrected response rate). Using multivariate analysis, the overall intention toward using antibiotic guidelines was not very predictable (model R 2 = .134). Habit strength (relative weight = .391) and PBC (relative weight = .354) were the principal significant predictors. A moderator effect of respondents’ position (staff member v. resident) was found, with staff members’ intention being significantly influenced only by habit strength and residents’ intention by PBC. Regarding previously identified barriers, education on antibiotics and guidelines was rated unsatisfactory. Conclusions . These divergent origins of influence on guideline adherence point to different approaches for improvement. As habits strongly influence staff members, methods that focus on changing habits (e.g., automated decision support systems) are possible interventions. As residents’ intention seems to be guided mainly by external influences and experienced control, this may make feedback, convenient guideline formats, and guideline familiarization more suitable.

Suggested Citation

  • Pieter-Jan Cortoos & Bert H. J. Schreurs & Willy E. Peetermans & Karel De Witte & Gert Laekeman, 2012. "Divergent Intentions to Use Antibiotic Guidelines," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 32(1), pages 145-153, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:32:y:2012:i:1:p:145-153
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X11406985
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X11406985
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X11406985?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lambert, Bruce L. & Salmon, J. Warren & Stubbings, Joann & Gilomen-Study, Gina & Valuck, Robert J. & Kezlarian, Kim, 1997. "Factors associated with antibiotic prescribing in a managed care setting: An exploratory investigation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 45(12), pages 1767-1779, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chenxi Liu & Chaojie Liu & Dan Wang & Xinping Zhang, 2019. "Knowledge, Attitudes and Intentions to Prescribe Antibiotics: A Structural Equation Modeling Study of Primary Care Institutions in Hubei, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-16, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:32:y:2012:i:1:p:145-153. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.