IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v31y2011i3p405-411.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Overestimation Error and Unnecessary Antibiotic Prescriptions for Acute Cystitis in Adult Women

Author

Listed:
  • Warren J. McIsaac
  • Cheryl L. Hunchak

Abstract

Background. Empiric antibiotic prescribing for suspected acute cystitis may lead to unnecessary prescriptions when urine cultures are negative. This study assessed whether physician overestimation of the likelihood of bacterial infection contributed to unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions. Methods. This was a cross-sectional study in Toronto, Canada, from 1998 to 2000 of 231 women 16 years and older who underwent standardized clinical assessments and urine culture testing. The main outcome was an unnecessary antibiotic prescription, defined as a prescription where the urine culture was negative. The difference between physician estimates of the likelihood of a positive urine culture and the measured culture rate for women with similar symptoms was used to measure overestimation error. Logistic regression was used to assess associations between unnecessary prescriptions and clinical factors or overestimation error. Multiple logistic regression was used to adjust for the effect of clinical factors. Results. Of 230 women assessed, 186 (80.9%) were prescribed antibiotics and 74 (32.2%) were prescribed an unnecessary antibiotic where the urine culture was negative. When an overestimation error above the median value (14.75%) was present, the odds of an unnecessary antibiotic prescription were increased (adjusted odds ratio = 3.72; 95% confidence interval = 1.75–7.89). A high overestimation error was associated with the symptoms of urinary frequency or suprapubic tenderness and costovertebral angle tenderness on examination. Conclusions. Physician overestimation of the likelihood of a positive urine culture in women with symptoms of acute cystitis was associated with unnecessary antibiotic prescribing. Antibiotic overuse may be reduced by developing treatment strategies that deemphasize nonspecific clinical findings that contribute to physician overestimation error.

Suggested Citation

  • Warren J. McIsaac & Cheryl L. Hunchak, 2011. "Overestimation Error and Unnecessary Antibiotic Prescriptions for Acute Cystitis in Adult Women," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 31(3), pages 405-411, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:31:y:2011:i:3:p:405-411
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X10391671
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X10391671
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X10391671?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Almudena Burillo & Belén Rodríguez-Sánchez & Ana Ramiro & Emilia Cercenado & Marta Rodríguez-Créixems & Emilio Bouza, 2014. "Gram-Stain Plus MALDI-TOF MS (Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry) for a Rapid Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-7, January.
    2. Rieger, Marc Oliver & Wang, Mei & Hausmann, Daniel, 2021. "Pre-decisional information acquisition: Why do we pay too much for information? Brief report," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    3. Marc Oliver Rieger & Mei Wang & Daniel Hausmann, 2020. "Pre-Decisional Information Acquisition: Do We Pay TooMuch for Information?," Working Paper Series 2020-02, University of Trier, Research Group Quantitative Finance and Risk Analysis.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:31:y:2011:i:3:p:405-411. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.