IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v31y2011i2p299-307.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost-Saving Tree-Structured Survival Analysis for Hip Fracture of Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Data

Author

Listed:
  • Hua Jin
  • Ying Lu

Abstract

It is important to predict osteoporotic fracture risk accurately in order to select high-risk patients for treatment. Previous tree-structured survival analysis (TSSA) methods focused on optimization in statistical performance in construction of survival trees. However, they did not take into account the cost of the predictive variables. Because of the high cost of some predictors, the derived algorithm may have only limited application in practice. In this article, the authors consider the cost-effectiveness in TSSA and propose a cost-saving TSSA (denoted as CSTSSA) to construct the survival tree for identifying subjects at high risk of hip fracture based on the data from Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. The new rule is compared with the optimum classification based on log-rank test statistics using the noninferiority test by Lu and others. The comparison results suggest that, for identifying patients at high risk of hip fracture, the CSTSSA is a good alternative to the optimum classification.

Suggested Citation

  • Hua Jin & Ying Lu, 2011. "Cost-Saving Tree-Structured Survival Analysis for Hip Fracture of Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Data," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 31(2), pages 299-307, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:31:y:2011:i:2:p:299-307
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X10377117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X10377117
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X10377117?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ciampi, Antonio & Thiffault, Johanne & Nakache, Jean-Pierre & Asselain, Bernard, 1986. "Stratification by stepwise regression, correspondence analysis and recursive partition: a comparison of three methods of analysis for survival data with covariates," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 185-204, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaogang Su & Juanjuan Fan, 2004. "Multivariate Survival Trees: A Maximum Likelihood Approach Based on Frailty Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 60(1), pages 93-99, March.
    2. Un Jung Lee & ShengLi Tzeng & Yu-Chuan Chen & James J Chen, 2017. "Development of Predictive Signatures for Treatment Selection in Precision Medicine," Biostatistics and Biometrics Open Access Journal, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 2(4), pages 83-88, August.
    3. Yan Zhou & John McArdle, 2015. "Rationale and Applications of Survival Tree and Survival Ensemble Methods," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(3), pages 811-833, September.
    4. Besse, Philippe & Leconte, Eve & Walschaerts, Marie, 2012. "Stable variable selection for right censored data: comparison of methods," TSE Working Papers 12-486, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    5. Susan Athey & Julie Tibshirani & Stefan Wager, 2016. "Generalized Random Forests," Papers 1610.01271, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2018.
    6. Hua Jin & Ying Lu & Kaite Stone & Dennis M. Black, 2004. "Alternative Tree-Structured Survival Analysis Based on Variance of Survival Time," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 24(6), pages 670-680, November.
    7. Zhang, Heping, 2004. "Recursive Partitioning and Tree-based Methods," Papers 2004,30, Humboldt University of Berlin, Center for Applied Statistics and Economics (CASE).
    8. Hoora Moradian & Denis Larocque & François Bellavance, 2017. "$$L_1$$ L 1 splitting rules in survival forests," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 671-691, October.
    9. A. S. Foulkes & V. De Gruttola, 2002. "Characterizing the Relationship Between HIV-1 Genotype and Phenotype: Prediction-Based Classification," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(1), pages 145-156, March.
    10. Wei-Yin Loh, 2014. "Fifty Years of Classification and Regression Trees," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 82(3), pages 329-348, December.
    11. Fan, Juanjuan & Nunn, Martha E. & Su, Xiaogang, 2009. "Multivariate exponential survival trees and their application to tooth prognosis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 1110-1121, February.
    12. Ana Ezquerro & Brais Cancela & Ana López-Cheda, 2023. "On the Reliability of Machine Learning Models for Survival Analysis When Cure Is a Possibility," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-21, October.
    13. Yifei Sun & Sy Han Chiou & Mei‐Cheng Wang, 2020. "ROC‐guided survival trees and ensembles," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(4), pages 1177-1189, December.
    14. Karen Lostritto & Robert L. Strawderman & Annette M. Molinaro, 2012. "A Partitioning Deletion/Substitution/Addition Algorithm for Creating Survival Risk Groups," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(4), pages 1146-1156, December.
    15. Rancoita, Paola M.V. & Zaffalon, Marco & Zucca, Emanuele & Bertoni, Francesco & de Campos, Cassio P., 2016. "Bayesian network data imputation with application to survival tree analysis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 373-387.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:31:y:2011:i:2:p:299-307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.