IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v27y2007i5p655-662.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Drug Facts Box: Providing Consumers with Simple Tabular Data on Drug Benefit and Harm

Author

Listed:
  • Lisa M. Schwartz

    (VA Outcomes Group (111B), Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction)

  • Steven Woloshin

    (VA Outcomes Group (111B), Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, steven.woloshin@dartmouth.edu)

  • H. Gilbert Welch

    (VA Outcomes Group (111B), Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction)

Abstract

Context. Direct-to-consumer drug ads have been criticized for providing inadequate and misleading information. Requiring ads to include a table with data on drug benefits and side effects (derived from clinical trials) could help, provided that consumers understand such tabular information. Objective. To determine if people could understand and use a 9-row × 2-column ``study findings table'' presenting expected outcomes (both beneficial and harmful) with and without a drug. Subjects.A convenience sample of 274 participants: 186 recruited from alumni of Dartmouth's ``Community Medical School'' public lecture series and Dartmouth Hitchcock's Center for Shared Decision Making and 88 veterans and their families recruited from waiting rooms in the Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic, White River Junction, Vermont. Design. Cross-sectional survey. Participants were tested on their comprehension of the study findings table about the drug tamoxifen used for the primary prevention of breast cancer—with no instructions on how to use the table. Main outcome measure. Five comprehension questions testing how well participants could read and use the table with drug benefits and side effects data. Results. On average, participants correctly answered 4 of the 5 table comprehension questions: 89% correctly used the table to determine the percentage of womengiventamoxifenwhogotabloodclotintheirlegsor lungs, and 71% were able to use data in the table to calculate the absolute difference in the proportion of women who got breast cancer in the tamoxifen v. the placebo group. Most participants were also able to use the table to make comparisons. Conclusion. Most participants—even those with lower formal educational attainment—were able to understand and use the tabular data.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisa M. Schwartz & Steven Woloshin & H. Gilbert Welch, 2007. "The Drug Facts Box: Providing Consumers with Simple Tabular Data on Drug Benefit and Harm," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 27(5), pages 655-662, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:27:y:2007:i:5:p:655-662
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X07306786
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X07306786
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X07306786?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cox, Anthony D. & Cox, Dena, 2010. "A defense of direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 221-228, March.
    2. Priya Bahri & Geoffrey Bowring & Brian D. Edwards & Christopher Anton & Jeffrey K. Aronson & Angela Caro-Rojas & Bruce P. J. Hugman & Peter G. Mol & Gianluca Trifirò & Katarina Ilic & Riadh Daghfous &, 2023. "Communicating for the Safe Use of Medicines: Progress and Directions for the 2020s Promoted by the Special Interest Group of the International Society of Pharmacovigilance," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 517-532, June.
    3. Pascal Aubertin & Thomas Frese & Jürgen Kasper & Wilfried Mau & Gabriele Meyer & Rafael Mikolajczyk & Matthias Richter & Jan Schildmann & Anke Steckelberg, 2023. "Efficacy of Three Numerical Presentation Formats on Lay People’s Comprehension and Risk Perception of Fact Boxes—A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-16, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:27:y:2007:i:5:p:655-662. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.