IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v19y1999i2p193-201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Goodness-of-fit Issues in ROC Curve Estimation

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen J. Walsh

Abstract

Zhou recently considered goodness-of-fit (GOF) testing for receiver operating char acteristic (ROC) curves estimated by applying the binormal and other bidistributional models to rating method data. He interpreted significant GOF tests as evidence that different decision thresholds were applied to diseased and nondiseased subjects and concluded that, in such circumstances, an ROC curve does not exist. In this article the author demonstrates that the GOF test accommodates many alternative hypoth eses and that a significant test result need not be equated with an interaction between disease status and decision criteria or with non-existence of an ROC curve. He de velops a new family of ROC curves based on a fully parameterized bidistributional model. The family includes the binormal ROC curve, but generalizes its structure by signifying all identifiable deviations in parameters of the latent distributions that define the model. The family provides a unified framework of alternative models to the binor mal assumption and of alternative hypotheses to the GOF test for that assumption. Key words: goodness-of-fit testing; ROC curves; rating method. (Med Decis Making 1999;19:193-201)

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen J. Walsh, 1999. "Goodness-of-fit Issues in ROC Curve Estimation," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 19(2), pages 193-201, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:19:y:1999:i:2:p:193-201
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9901900210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X9901900210
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X9901900210?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:19:y:1999:i:2:p:193-201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.