IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v18y1998i3p249-255.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perfect Timing, No Remorse, and Kidney Transplantation

Author

Listed:
  • Donald A. Brand

Abstract

Kidney transplantation is usually delayed until a patient has reached end-stage renal failure. When a living donor is used, earlier transplantation may be feasible. By averting the final stages of renal failure, early transplantation spares the patient the more pronounced effects of uremia. Unfortunately, lack of precision in predicting the future course of a patient's disease creates a dilemma: the kidneys could remain viable longer than anticipated. In that case, an early transplantation that leads to serious complications or graft failure will have caused harm by truncating the period of time the patient could have been sustained by his or her native kidneys. The present article introduces a theorem that helps solve the dilemma of early kidney transplantation. The theorem states that the timing decision depends only on the current burden of a disease relative to the nsks of transplantation—that the future rate of progression of the disease is immaterial. The generality of the theorem makes it applicable, in principle, to any de generative disease that can be treated by engraftment. The article also introduces a formula for the optimal timing of transplantation that depends on only four factors-a patient's perceived quality of life before transplantation as a function of time, the mortality associated with a transplant operation, the graft survival curve, and the quality of life in the event of a graft failure. The theorem and related formula should be helpful to patients and physicians in selecting the best time for transplantation. Key words: kidney transplantation; decision theory; decision support; quality of life. (Med Decis Making 1998;18:249-255)

Suggested Citation

  • Donald A. Brand, 1998. "Perfect Timing, No Remorse, and Kidney Transplantation," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 18(3), pages 249-255, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:18:y:1998:i:3:p:249-255
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9801800301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X9801800301
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X9801800301?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria Bruni & Domenico Conforti & Nicola Sicilia & Sandro Trotta, 2006. "A new organ transplantation location–allocation policy: a case study of Italy," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 125-142, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:18:y:1998:i:3:p:249-255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.