IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/manlab/v51y2026i3_supplps44-s66.html

ChatGPT and Academic Integrity: What Drives Management Students to Be Honest or Dishonest?

Author

Listed:
  • Periasamy Mathivanan
  • S. V. Ramana Rao

Abstract

The surge in artificial intelligence (AI) adoption in higher education, exemplified by Large Language Models like ChatGPT, offers unprecedented opportunities for learning and collaboration while posing potential threats to academic integrity. This study investigates the complex relationship between personal factors, external factors, technological advancements, especially AI adoption, and the academic integrity of post-graduate management students. The central element of this study is a mini-project assigned to 60 PGDM students in a Business Research Methods course. Preliminary evaluations of the project reports submitted by students suggested extensive use of AI-generated content. The submitted reports were classified by level of AI-generated content, and this classification was then integrated with student responses to a structured questionnaire grounded in eight theoretical constructs related to academic integrity. Employing an explanatory sequential mixed-method design, the study first used discriminant analysis to identify the factors that influence students’ ethical decision-making within AI-integrated educational environments, followed by thematic analysis of students’ qualitative responses to triangulate the findings. This research finds that peer pressure, academic stress, and perceived institutional unfairness drive management students to unethical use of AI tools. This study highlights the need for transparent evaluation practices, a mechanism for peer accountability, institutional support systems and clear guidelines on ethical AI use. If the institutions fail to provide support, students are more likely to engage in behaviours that may put their academic future at risk. The study has implications for teaching interventions, policy formulation, and future research that may help create a culture of integrity within AI-enhanced learning environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Periasamy Mathivanan & S. V. Ramana Rao, 2026. "ChatGPT and Academic Integrity: What Drives Management Students to Be Honest or Dishonest?," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 51(3_suppl), pages 44-66, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:manlab:v:51:y:2026:i:3_suppl:p:s44-s66
    DOI: 10.1177/0258042X261416626
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0258042X261416626
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0258042X261416626?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:manlab:v:51:y:2026:i:3_suppl:p:s44-s66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.xlri.ac.in/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.