IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/manlab/v51y2026i2p173-189.html

Student Perception of Course and Teacher Quality: A Comprehensive Cluster Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Faruk Guder
  • Mary Malliaris
  • Arup Varma

Abstract

End-of-term course evaluations often use multiple-choice questions asking students to evaluate their experience with the class. Students are also asked to give an overall score to the instructor and to the course. To help instructors interpret the scores and work to improve their evaluations, we looked at 16 descriptive statements in 2,048 evaluations of course sections over a span of 4 years. Cluster analyses revealed that the course score related the most to Cluster 2 statements (feedback and challenge) and the instructor score to Cluster 4 statements (clear and stimulating presentations). We then analysed these specific clusters in more detail to provide specific recommendations to faculty on how to improve their student evaluation of teaching scores using this output. Overall, our study revealed several critical benefits of student evaluations of teaching effectiveness. Key findings include: (a) clear and informative teaching helps decrease student stress; (b) encouraging students to set and achieve challenging goals promotes personal and academic growth, and the fact that (c) students want to feel challenged, so they can grow. We discuss the implications of our findings and offer suggestions for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Faruk Guder & Mary Malliaris & Arup Varma, 2026. "Student Perception of Course and Teacher Quality: A Comprehensive Cluster Analysis," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 51(2), pages 173-189, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:manlab:v:51:y:2026:i:2:p:173-189
    DOI: 10.1177/0258042X261442004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0258042X261442004
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0258042X261442004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:manlab:v:51:y:2026:i:2:p:173-189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.xlri.ac.in/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.