IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/loceco/v26y2011i8p652-662.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The problem of letting go: The ‘Big Society’, accountable governance and ‘the curse of the decentralizing minister’

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew Flinders
  • David S. Moon

Abstract

While clear lines of accountability are normally considered a sine qua non of any modern democracy, this article argues that too much accountability can be as problematic as too little. Through the application of a number of analytical ‘hooks’ drawn from the accountability studies literature, it argues that if the coalition government’s rhetorical commitment to a shift from a ‘Big State’ to a ‘Big Society’ is implemented, it may well flounder due to its inability to reconcile the centrifugal forces of devolution and localism with the centripetal forces of political accountability and public expectation. Indeed, without a more aggressive, sophisticated and indeed honest approach to accountability, the ‘Big Society’ is unwittingly likely to forge an even ‘Bigger State’.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew Flinders & David S. Moon, 2011. "The problem of letting go: The ‘Big Society’, accountable governance and ‘the curse of the decentralizing minister’," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 26(8), pages 652-662, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:26:y:2011:i:8:p:652-662
    DOI: 10.1177/0269094211422187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0269094211422187
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0269094211422187?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dino Falaschetti, 2009. "Democratic Governance and Economic Performance," Studies in Public Choice, Springer, number 978-0-387-78707-7, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vivien Lowndes & Sharon Squires, 2012. "Cuts, collaboration and creativity," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(6), pages 401-408, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Woutersen, Tiemen & Khandker, Shahidur R., 2014. "Estimating the long-run impact of microcredit programs on household income and net worth," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7040, The World Bank.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:26:y:2011:i:8:p:652-662. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/index.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.