The problem of letting go: The â€˜Big Societyâ€™, accountable governance and â€˜the curse of the decentralizing ministerâ€™
While clear lines of accountability are normally considered a sine qua non of any modern democracy, this article argues that too much accountability can be as problematic as too little. Through the application of a number of analytical â€˜hooksâ€™ drawn from the accountability studies literature, it argues that if the coalition governmentâ€™s rhetorical commitment to a shift from a â€˜Big Stateâ€™ to a â€˜Big Societyâ€™ is implemented, it may well flounder due to its inability to reconcile the centrifugal forces of devolution and localism with the centripetal forces of political accountability and public expectation. Indeed, without a more aggressive, sophisticated and indeed honest approach to accountability, the â€˜Big Societyâ€™ is unwittingly likely to forge an even â€˜Bigger Stateâ€™.
Volume (Year): 26 (2011)
Issue (Month): 8 (December)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/index.shtml|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:26:y:2011:i:8:p:652-662. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (SAGE Publishing)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.