IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/loceco/v18y2003i3p237-252.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing Frameworks for Examining Community Participation in a Multi-Level Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Mike Smith

    (INLOGOV, School of Public Policy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK. E-mail: m.m.smith.1@bham.ac.uk)

  • Helen Sullivan

    (University of the West of England, UK. E-mail: helen.sullivan@uwe.ac.uk)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explore public participation from the perspective of two parallel developments in English urban governance since 1997: namely the attempts to modernise local government and area-based approaches employed to tackle social exclusion. The paper will situate these developments within a system of multi-level governance and highlight the significance of the locality-neighbourhood axis. The paper seeks to explicate current changes by drawing on theories of governance. The emphasis on mechanisms that bring together relevant local interests to secure coherence and stability in matters of local governance, combined with the specific focus on the role of citizens and communities as key partners in these arrangements resonates strongly with the key concerns of regime theory. The strengths and limitations of regime theory are discussed with particular reference to matters of contextual specificity. Community Governance is then introduced as a means of better understanding the institutional framework of English localities and, we argue, of providing a sounder basis for the application of regime theory. More powerful still is the potential synthesis of regime approaches with different interpretations of community governance and the paper concludes by drawing on recent developments in English localities to elaborate the potential offered by the this synthesised framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Mike Smith & Helen Sullivan, 2003. "Developing Frameworks for Examining Community Participation in a Multi-Level Environment," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 18(3), pages 237-252, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:18:y:2003:i:3:p:237-252
    DOI: 10.1080/0269094032000114586
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/0269094032000114586
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0269094032000114586?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harding, Alan, 1999. "Review Article: North Urban Political Economy, Urban Theory and British Research," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(4), pages 673-698, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Valler & David Betteley, 2001. "The Politics of 'Integrated' Local Policy in England," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(13), pages 2393-2413, December.
    2. Andrew M. Wood, 2004. "Domesticating Urban Theory? US Concepts, British Cities and the Limits of Cross-national Applications," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(11), pages 2103-2118, October.
    3. Gordon MacLeod & Martin Jones, 2011. "Renewing Urban Politics," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(12), pages 2443-2472, September.
    4. Youliang Guo & Chengguo Zhang & Ya Ping Wang & Xun Li, 2018. "(De-)Activating the growth machine for redevelopment: The case of Liede urban village in Guangzhou," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(7), pages 1420-1438, May.
    5. Gordon MacLeod, 2011. "Urban Politics Reconsidered," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(12), pages 2629-2660, September.
    6. Timothy W Collins, 2008. "Unevenness in Urban Governance: Stadium Building and Downtown Redevelopment in Phoenix, Arizona," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 26(6), pages 1177-1196, December.
    7. Veiko Lember & Tarmo Kalvet & Rainer Kattel, 2011. "Urban Competitiveness and Public Procurement for Innovation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(7), pages 1373-1395, May.
    8. Scott Gissendanner, 2003. "Methodology Problems in Urban Governance Studies," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 21(5), pages 663-685, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:18:y:2003:i:3:p:237-252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/index.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.