IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/loceco/v14y1999i2p114-132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Song has Ended but the Melody Lingers

Author

Listed:
  • Iain Deas

    (Department of Planning and Landscape, University of Manchester)

  • Kevin G. Ward

    (International Centre for Labour Studies & School of Geography, University of Manchester)

Abstract

This paper assesses the prospects for the Regional Development Agency (RDA) initiative, in light of the experience of Britain's Urban Development Corporation (UDC) programme. It explores the contrasts between the two initiatives and considers the prospects for the RDA programme. The paper argues that RDAs pose only limited constitutional implications, but should be more accurately considered as another managerial innovation — reflecting the Blairite preoccupation with “joined-up government†— in the search for more effective delivery mechanisms for sub-national economic development policy. It concludes by arguing that RDAs, like UDCs before them, represent a new hub of power to which locally accountable policy makers may prove to be marginal.

Suggested Citation

  • Iain Deas & Kevin G. Ward, 1999. "The Song has Ended but the Melody Lingers," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 14(2), pages 114-132, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:14:y:1999:i:2:p:114-132
    DOI: 10.1080/02690949908726482
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/02690949908726482
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02690949908726482?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. K G Ward, 1997. "Coalitions in Urban Regeneration: A Regime Approach," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 29(8), pages 1493-1506, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hugo Marcelo Zunino, 2006. "Power Relations in Urban Decision-making: Neo-liberalism, 'Techno-politicians' and Authoritarian Redevelopment in Santiago, Chile," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(10), pages 1825-1846, September.
    2. Zoë Morrison, 2003. "Recognising ‘Recognition’: Social Justice and the Place of the Cultural in Social Exclusion Policy and Practice," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 35(9), pages 1629-1649, September.
    3. Hugh Ward & Peter John, 2008. "A Spatial Model of Competitive Bidding for Government Grants: Why Efficiency Gains Are Limited," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 20(1), pages 47-66, January.
    4. Gordon MacLeod & Mike Raco & Kevin Ward, 2003. "Negotiating the Contemporary City: Introduction," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(9), pages 1655-1671, August.
    5. Fangyun Xie & Guiwen Liu & Taozhi Zhuang, 2021. "A Comprehensive Review of Urban Regeneration Governance for Developing Appropriate Governance Arrangements," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-28, May.
    6. Stephen Greasley & Peter John & Harold Wolman, 2011. "Does Government Performance Matter? The Effects of Local Government on Urban Outcomes in England," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(9), pages 1835-1851, July.
    7. Peter North, 2000. "Is There Space for Organisation from Below within the UK Government's Action Zones? A Test of 'Collaborative Planning'," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(8), pages 1261-1278, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:14:y:1999:i:2:p:114-132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/index.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.