IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v35y2003i9p1629-1649.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recognising ‘Recognition’: Social Justice and the Place of the Cultural in Social Exclusion Policy and Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Zoë Morrison

    (School of Geography and the Environment, Oxford University, Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3TB, England)

Abstract

In this paper, I contest the claim that cultural geography is ‘irrelevant’ to policy addressing major social justice issues. Engaging both with the ‘relevance’ and the ‘culture–economy’ debates in human geography, and with wider feminist political theory, I argue that the recognition of issues of ‘cultural justice’ is crucial to an effective engagement with social justice issues. I suggest a new approach to the cultural economy debate that neither forces a choice between culture and economy, nor only ‘transcends’ their division. Instead, the concept of ‘revaluing’ is introduced, which encompasses both the cultural and the economic but allows one or the other, or both, to be asserted—depending on the spatial and political context. These points are developed through a qualitative case study of the Single Regeneration Budget, a policy which attempts to address social exclusion, inequality, and deprivation. This case study suggests that a lack of attention to cultural justice issues, such as recognition and respect, leads to a policy that fails to remedy, and even perpetuates, the exclusionary mechanisms it seeks to address. Instead, a more fundamental revaluing of socially excluded people and places needs to be carried out in order to achieve greater inclusion. Indeed, reflecting on these issues through cultural and feminist lenses, I suggest a wider remit than policy for human geographers to engage effectively with major social justice issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Zoë Morrison, 2003. "Recognising ‘Recognition’: Social Justice and the Place of the Cultural in Social Exclusion Policy and Practice," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 35(9), pages 1629-1649, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:35:y:2003:i:9:p:1629-1649
    DOI: 10.1068/a3574
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a3574
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a3574?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. K G Ward, 1997. "Coalitions in Urban Regeneration: A Regime Approach," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 29(8), pages 1493-1506, August.
    2. Geoff Fordham & Jo Hutchinson & Paul Foley, 1999. "Strategic Approaches to Local Regeneration: The Single Regeneration Budget Challenge Fund," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(2), pages 131-141.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Steven Henderson, 2012. "An Evaluation of the Layering and Legacy of Area-based Regeneration Initiatives in England: The Case of Wolverhampton," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(6), pages 1201-1227, May.
    2. Hugo Marcelo Zunino, 2006. "Power Relations in Urban Decision-making: Neo-liberalism, 'Techno-politicians' and Authoritarian Redevelopment in Santiago, Chile," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(10), pages 1825-1846, September.
    3. John Diamond, 2001. "Managing Change or Coping with Conflict? - Mapping the Experience of a Local Regeneration Partnership," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 16(4), pages 272-285, November.
    4. Hugh Ward & Peter John, 2008. "A Spatial Model of Competitive Bidding for Government Grants: Why Efficiency Gains Are Limited," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 20(1), pages 47-66, January.
    5. Gordon MacLeod & Mike Raco & Kevin Ward, 2003. "Negotiating the Contemporary City: Introduction," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(9), pages 1655-1671, August.
    6. Fangyun Xie & Guiwen Liu & Taozhi Zhuang, 2021. "A Comprehensive Review of Urban Regeneration Governance for Developing Appropriate Governance Arrangements," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-28, May.
    7. Stephen Greasley & Peter John & Harold Wolman, 2011. "Does Government Performance Matter? The Effects of Local Government on Urban Outcomes in England," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(9), pages 1835-1851, July.
    8. Julie MacLeavy, 2009. "(Re)Analysing Community Empowerment: Rationalities and Technologies of Government in Bristol's New Deal for Communities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(4), pages 849-875, April.
    9. Keith Jacobs, 2004. "Waterfront Redevelopment: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Policy-making Process within the Chatham Maritime Project," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(4), pages 817-832, April.
    10. Suzi Macpherson, 2006. "Promoting ‘Strategic’ Working within Area-based and Thematic Social Inclusion Partnerships in Scotland," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 21(2), pages 180-196, May.
    11. Iain Deas & Kevin G. Ward, 1999. "The Song has Ended but the Melody Lingers," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 14(2), pages 114-132, August.
    12. Andrew Smith & Tim Fox, 2007. "From 'Event-led' to 'Event-themed' Regeneration: The 2002 Commonwealth Games Legacy Programme," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(5-6), pages 1125-1143, May.
    13. Peter North, 2000. "Is There Space for Organisation from Below within the UK Government's Action Zones? A Test of 'Collaborative Planning'," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(8), pages 1261-1278, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:35:y:2003:i:9:p:1629-1649. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.