IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/joupea/v51y2014i2p145-158.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Peace research – Just the study of war?

Author

Listed:
  • Nils Petter Gleditsch

    (Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO) & Department of Political Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology)

  • Jonas Nordkvelle

    (Department of Political Science, University of Oslo & PRIO)

  • HÃ¥vard Strand

    (Department of Political Science, University of Oslo & PRIO)

Abstract

The concept of peace has been under discussion in peace research from its start over 50 years ago. This article reviews the debate on broader and narrower conceptions of peace and investigates empirical patterns in the first 49 volumes of Journal of Peace Research, with some comparisons with Journal of Conflict Resolution. Negative peace, in the sense of reducing war, was the main focus in peace research from the inception. But positive peace, in the sense of cooperation or integration, has also always been on the peace research agenda, as reflected in the contents of both journals. Over time, a larger share of the articles in JPR has ‘violence’ or related terms in the title, while the incidence of the word ‘peace’ is fairly stable. Furthermore, articles on peace generally have fewer citations than those with violence-related terms. A broad concept of peace, as encouraged by the definition of positive peace as the reversal of structural violence, was popular in peace research for a decade or so, but has largely evaporated. To some extent, peace research has returned to its original agenda, although the main attention has shifted from interstate war to civil war and to some extent to one-sided and non-state violence. Articles dealing with patterns of cooperation, the traditional meaning of positive peace, now tend to address the liberal agenda and ask how they can foster a reduced probability of violence. Despite the ‘gender gap’, the increasing share of female authors in the journal appears to have had little influence on these developments although it may well have had other effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Nils Petter Gleditsch & Jonas Nordkvelle & HÃ¥vard Strand, 2014. "Peace research – Just the study of war?," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 51(2), pages 145-158, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:51:y:2014:i:2:p:145-158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jpr.sagepub.com/content/51/2/145.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuri van Hoef & Andrea Oelsner, 2018. "Friendship and Positive Peace: Conceptualising Friendship in Politics and International Relations," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 115-124.
    2. Ricardo Real P. Sousa, 2018. "The context of conflict resolution - international relations and the study of peace and conflict," CEsA Working Papers 164, CEsA - Centre for African and Development Studies.
    3. Rami Zeedan, 2019. "The Role of Military Service in the Integration/Segregation of Muslims, Christians and Druze within Israel," Societies, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Yilmaz Bayar & Marius Dan Gavriletea, 2018. "Peace, terrorism and economic growth in Middle East and North African countries," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(5), pages 2373-2392, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:51:y:2014:i:2:p:145-158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.prio.no/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.