IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jedbes/v30y2005i1p59-73.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Propensity Score Subclassification for Multiple Treatment Doses to Evaluate a National Antidrug Media Campaign

Author

Listed:
  • Elaine Zanutto
  • Bo Lu
  • Robert Hornik

Abstract

In 1998, the U.S. Office of National Drug Control Policy launched a national media campaign in an effort to reduce and prevent drug use among young Americans. Because the campaign was implemented nationwide, there is no control group available for use in evaluating the effects of the campaign. Nevertheless, it is possible to use propensity score methods to evaluate the effects of the campaign. However, because teens receive varying degrees of exposure to the media campaign, it is necessary to apply propensity score methods that accommodate multiple treatment doses. This work extends that of previous authors to subclassification on the propensity score for observational studies with multiple treatment doses, rather than matching on the propensity score, and proposes modifications to accommodate complex survey data. This methodology is illustrated using data from a pilot study for the media campaign evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Elaine Zanutto & Bo Lu & Robert Hornik, 2005. "Using Propensity Score Subclassification for Multiple Treatment Doses to Evaluate a National Antidrug Media Campaign," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 30(1), pages 59-73, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:30:y:2005:i:1:p:59-73
    DOI: 10.3102/10769986030001059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/10769986030001059
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3102/10769986030001059?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lenis, David & Ackerman, Benjamin & Stuart, Elizabeth A., 2018. "Measuring model misspecification: Application to propensity score methods with complex survey data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 48-57.
    2. Anna Maria Koukal, 2017. "How Vatican II influenced female enfranchisement: A story of rapid cultural change," CREMA Working Paper Series 2017-07, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    3. Shu Yang & Guido W. Imbens & Zhanglin Cui & Douglas E. Faries & Zbigniew Kadziola, 2016. "Propensity score matching and subclassification in observational studies with multi‐level treatments," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 72(4), pages 1055-1065, December.
    4. Kuchibhotla, Murali, 2013. "Three essays in development economics," ISU General Staff Papers 201301010800004461, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    5. Rüdiger Mutz & Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2012. "The generalized propensity score methodology for estimating unbiased journal impact factors," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 92(2), pages 377-390, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:30:y:2005:i:1:p:59-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.