IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/intdis/v13y2017i7p1550147717723163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of traffic congestion degree: An integrated approach

Author

Listed:
  • Nannan Hao
  • Yixiong Feng
  • Kai Zhang
  • Guangdong Tian
  • Lele Zhang
  • Hongfei Jia

Abstract

Intersection traffic congestion evaluation is essential for effective intelligent transportation system planning, and an objective and precise assessment of traffic congestion is vital to ensure the smooth circulation of traffic. Multiple criteria decision-making is a method for evaluating the degree of traffic congestion. A hybrid multiple criteria decision-making method integrating the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, techniques for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution, and gray correlation techniques are presented in this work. The proposed method applied fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to determine the weight of the evaluation index; subsequently, gray correlation techniques for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution were integrated to construct the hybrid decision-making method. A case study of traffic congestion at intersections with five evaluation indexes verified the effectiveness of the hybrid method. The evaluation results of the different methods show that the proposed method overcomes the one-sidedness of analytical hierarchy process–techniques for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution and analytical hierarchy process–gray correlation. Thus, the proposed hybrid decision-making model provides a more accurate and reliable method for evaluating the degree of traffic congestion.

Suggested Citation

  • Nannan Hao & Yixiong Feng & Kai Zhang & Guangdong Tian & Lele Zhang & Hongfei Jia, 2017. "Evaluation of traffic congestion degree: An integrated approach," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 13(7), pages 15501477177, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:intdis:v:13:y:2017:i:7:p:1550147717723163
    DOI: 10.1177/1550147717723163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1550147717723163
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1550147717723163?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:intdis:v:13:y:2017:i:7:p:1550147717723163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.