IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/inafri/v5y2013i1p35-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Internal and External Political Dynamics Influencing Lesotho’s Foreign Policy

Author

Listed:
  • M.K. Mahlakeng

    (M.K. Mahlakeng, Department of Political Studies and Governance, University of the Free State, South Africa. E-mail: mahlakengmk@qwa.ufs.ac.za)

  • Hussein Solomon

    (Hussein Solomon, Department of Political Studies and Governance, University of the Free State, South Africa. E-mail: hussein.solomon@gmail.com)

Abstract

Due to the globalised nature of the world, the political foreign policies of landlocked states (LLS) have been affected, resulting in landlocked countries lagging behind their maritime neighbours in the overall development. Within the notion of landlocked states, it is important to note that there is a difference between states surrounded by the territory of only one other state, which can be defined as ‘enclaves’, and those that have several other states to engage with. The problems of enclaves are more delicate and serious than those of non-enclave LLS. Their mere economic existence, leading to political existence, may depend heavily upon the benevolence of their encircling neighbours. The Kingdom of Lesotho is an enclave landlocked, independent parliamentary constitutional monarchy, entirely surrounded by the Republic of South Africa. The tiny landlocked country, covering 30,355 square kilometres, has been subject to both internal and external political issues. Lesotho has had numerous forms of government, coups and internal political factions, which have hindered political development and stability. Detrimental to its economy, sovereignty and political power was the 1998 South African - Southern African Development Community (SADC) military intervention. The article explores these issues.

Suggested Citation

  • M.K. Mahlakeng & Hussein Solomon, 2013. "Internal and External Political Dynamics Influencing Lesotho’s Foreign Policy," Insight on Africa, , vol. 5(1), pages 35-53, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:inafri:v:5:y:2013:i:1:p:35-53
    DOI: 10.1177/0975087813512053
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0975087813512053
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0975087813512053?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:inafri:v:5:y:2013:i:1:p:35-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.