IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/inafri/v13y2021i2p127-141.html

Understanding Public Sentiment in Relation to the African Continental Free Trade Agreement

Author

Listed:
  • Olubunmi Ajala
  • Amanze Ejiogu
  • Adeniyi Lawal

Abstract

This study explores public sentiment in relation to the African Continental Free Trade Agreement (ACFTA) by analysing 18,481 tweets mentioning ACFTA over a three-month period. The findings highlight the dominance of actors outside the African continent in the public discourse on ACFTA thus indicating the importance of the African diaspora and foreign interests in framing the debate and influencing public opinion on the continent. They also highlight the salient issues in the public debate on ACFTA to include its potential effects on national economies and jobs as well as the potential for its exploitation by foreign interests. The study also points at a disconnect between governments and politicians promoting ACFTA on the one hand and the average citizen in Africa on the other as it shows a general negative sentiment in all regions and age groups, and more particularly in West Africa and amongst males towards ACFTA.

Suggested Citation

  • Olubunmi Ajala & Amanze Ejiogu & Adeniyi Lawal, 2021. "Understanding Public Sentiment in Relation to the African Continental Free Trade Agreement," Insight on Africa, , vol. 13(2), pages 127-141, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:inafri:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:127-141
    DOI: 10.1177/09750878211012884
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09750878211012884
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09750878211012884?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barry Eichengreen & Rebecca Mari & Gregory Thwaites, 2018. "Will Brexit Age Well? Cohorts, Seasoning and the Age-Leave Gradient, Past, Present and Future," NBER Working Papers 25219, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Georgiadou, Elena & Angelopoulos, Spyros & Drake, Helen, 2020. "Big data analytics and international negotiations: Sentiment analysis of Brexit negotiating outcomes," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Josh Matti, 2026. "Economic integration and public perceptions: Evidence from the African Continental Free Trade Area," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(2), pages 224-242, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cano-Marin, Enrique & Mora-Cantallops, Marçal & Sánchez-Alonso, Salvador, 2023. "Twitter as a predictive system: A systematic literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    2. Md Altab Hossin & Jie Du & Lei Mu & Isaac Owusu Asante, 2023. "Big Data-Driven Public Policy Decisions: Transformation Toward Smart Governance," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    3. Franziska Sofia Hafner & Lena Hafner & Roberto Corizzo, 2025. "‘Slightly disappointing’ vs. ‘worst sh** ever’: tackling cultural differences in negative sentiment expressions in AI-based sentiment analysis," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 1-31, August.
    4. Sheema Liza Idris & Masurah Mohamad, 2023. "A Study on Sentiment Analysis on Airline Quality Services: A Conceptual Paper," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 15(4), pages 564-576.
    5. Spyros Angelopoulos & Kubra S. Canhilal & Matthew A. Hawkins, 2023. "From Groups to Communities: A Resource Mobilization Theory Perspective on the Emergence of Communities," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 2457-2474, December.
    6. Eleonora Alabrese & Thiemo René Fetzer & Thiemo Fetzer, 2018. "Who is NOT Voting for Brexit Anymore?," CESifo Working Paper Series 7389, CESifo.
    7. Fidrmuc, Jan & Hulényi, Martin & Tunalı, Çiğdem Börke, 2019. "Can money buy EU love?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    8. Dan-Cristian Dabija & Liana Stanca & Luiela Magdalena Csorba & Luiza Souca, "undated". "Specific Skills in Modern Online Negotiations: A Word Cloud and Content Analysis," BASIQ Conference Proceedings 2025:003, Bucharest University of Economic Studies.
    9. Meihua Zuo & Spyros Angelopoulos & Zhouyang Liang & Carol X. J. Ou, 2023. "Blazing the Trail: Considering Browsing Path Dependence in Online Service Response Strategy," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 1605-1619, August.
    10. Raghav Gupta & Md Mahadi Hasan & Syed Zahurul Islam & Tahmina Yasmin & Jasim Uddin, 2023. "Evaluating the Brexit and COVID-19’s influence on the UK economy: A data analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(6), pages 1-33, June.
    11. Eugene Beaulieu & Kamala Dawar & Lindsey Garner-Knapp, 2019. "Canada-U.K. Free Trade: Balancing Progressive Trade Policies And Economic Benefits," SPP Briefing Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 12(43), December.
    12. Ahlfeldt, Gabriel M. & Maennig, Wolfgang & Mueller, Steffen Q., 2022. "The generation gap in direct democracy: Age vs. cohort effects," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    13. Salvador Santino Regilme, 2025. "Europe's Super‐Rich: Towards Oligarchic Constitutional Order," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(4), pages 1360-1375, July.
    14. van der Harst, Jesse Pieter & Angelopoulos, Spyros, 2024. "Less is more: Engagement with the content of social media influencers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    15. Barry Eichengreen & Rebecca Maria Mari & Gregory Thwaites, 2021. "Will Brexit Age Well? Cohorts, Seasoning and the Age–Leave Gradient: On the Evolution of UK Support for the European Union," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 88(352), pages 1130-1143, October.
    16. Liberini, Federica & Oswald, Andrew J. & Proto, Eugenio & Redoano, Michela, 2019. "Was Brexit triggered by the old and unhappy? Or by financial feelings?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 287-302.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:inafri:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:127-141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.