IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ilrrev/v78y2025i4p587-613.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lucy and the Chocolate Factory: Warehouse Robotics and Worker Safety

Author

Listed:
  • Gordon Burtch
  • Brad Greenwood
  • Kiron Ravindran

Abstract

The authors examine the implications of robotics for warehouse worker safety. While warehouse automation has the potential to reduce injuries by eliminating high-risk tasks, it may also increase injuries among remaining non-automated tasks because of reduced task variety and an accelerated pace of work. Findings provide evidence of both effects: Warehouse robotics are associated with a 40% decrease in severe injuries but a 77% increase in non-severe injuries. The authors provide subsequent evidence that the rise in non-severe injuries is at least partially attributable to the increased pace of work at robotics facilities. The implications of the findings for regulators, policymakers, workers, and firms are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Gordon Burtch & Brad Greenwood & Kiron Ravindran, 2025. "Lucy and the Chocolate Factory: Warehouse Robotics and Worker Safety," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 78(4), pages 587-613, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:78:y:2025:i:4:p:587-613
    DOI: 10.1177/00197939251333754
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00197939251333754
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00197939251333754?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:78:y:2025:i:4:p:587-613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ilr.cornell.edu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.