IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ilrrev/v78y2025i3p463-493.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Going Global: Comparing Union Resourcefulness in Securing Inclusion in Supply Chain Labor Governance Initiatives

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Ashwin
  • Nora Lohmeyer
  • Niklas Egels-Zandén
  • Rachel Alexander

Abstract

This article, based on stakeholder interviews and document analysis, compares the development of supply chain labor governance institutions in the United Kingdom, Sweden, and Germany beginning in the late 1990s. The authors address the puzzle of why the United Kingdom’s union-inclusive multi-stakeholder initiative (MSI), the Ethical Trading Initiative, rose to national dominance, while two similar MSIs failed in Germany (the Roundtable Codes of Conduct) and Sweden (DressCode). They find that these differing outcomes can be explained by the approaches of Northern unions to address problems of representation in relation to Southern workers in governance struggles, and how effectively they used the power resources at their disposal. The authors develop an agentic theory of union resourcefulness based on these findings, which complements extant structural arguments. Drawing on theories of ideational power resources, they show how sensemaking processes are central to marshaling and (re)creating power resources. This theorization of resourcefulness helps to explain outcome variation in unions’ ongoing struggle for influence in globalized production.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Ashwin & Nora Lohmeyer & Niklas Egels-Zandén & Rachel Alexander, 2025. "Going Global: Comparing Union Resourcefulness in Securing Inclusion in Supply Chain Labor Governance Initiatives," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 78(3), pages 463-493, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:78:y:2025:i:3:p:463-493
    DOI: 10.1177/00197939251321815
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00197939251321815
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00197939251321815?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:78:y:2025:i:3:p:463-493. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ilr.cornell.edu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.