IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ilrrev/v74y2021i2p511-543.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multitasking Incentives and the Informative Value of Subjective Performance Evaluations

Author

Listed:
  • Shingo Takahashi
  • Hideo Owan
  • Tsuyoshi Tsuru
  • Katsuhito Uehara

Abstract

Using personnel records from a car sales company, this study shows that subjective performance evaluations of sales representatives are less sensitive to objectively measured sales in the presence of hard-to-measure, non-sales tasks. Findings confirm that supervisors use the evaluations to incentivize employees to pursue these tasks, such as mentoring junior representatives and building long-term customer relationships. The authors show that subjective evaluations predict future sales, suggesting that the evaluations have informative content related to actual worker performance. The authors find that the response of workers who receive lower-than-expected evaluations differs by supervisor experience: Those who are evaluated by inexperienced supervisors quit more often, whereas those who are evaluated by experienced supervisors respond with lower sales in the next period, even though distribution of evaluations does not vary by supervisor experience. Results are consistent with the interpretation that experienced supervisors are better able to communicate with workers to induce desired behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Shingo Takahashi & Hideo Owan & Tsuyoshi Tsuru & Katsuhito Uehara, 2021. "Multitasking Incentives and the Informative Value of Subjective Performance Evaluations," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 74(2), pages 511-543, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:74:y:2021:i:2:p:511-543
    DOI: 10.1177/0019793919891980
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0019793919891980
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0019793919891980?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:74:y:2021:i:2:p:511-543. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ilr.cornell.edu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.