IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ilrrev/v71y2018i1p3-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In Search of the High Road: Meaning and Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Osterman

Abstract

This article is the first in a series to celebrate the 70th anniversary of the ILR Review . We will be highlighting important research themes that have been featured in the journal over its many years of publication. In this article, Paul Osterman reviews research on the quality of jobs and recent debates over “High Road†and “Low Road†approaches to employment practices. Scholars and policy advocates frequently utilize the distinction between High Road and Low Road firms as a framework for efforts to improve the quality of work in low-wage employers. This article assesses the logic and evidence that underlies this construct. The author provides a definition of the concept and examines the evidence behind the assumption that firms have a choice in how they design their employment policies. He then takes up the assertion that firms that adopt a High Road model can “do well by doing good†and adds precision to this claim by reviewing the evidence that a profit-maximizing firm would benefit from following the High Road path. The article concludes by suggesting a research agenda and providing a framework for policy that flows from the conclusions drawn from the existing research base.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Osterman, 2018. "In Search of the High Road: Meaning and Evidence," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 71(1), pages 3-34, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:71:y:2018:i:1:p:3-34
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ilr.sagepub.com/content/71/1/3.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Drusilla Brown & Rajeev Dehejia & Raymond Robertson, 2018. "The Impact of Better Work: Firm Performance in Vietnam, Indonesia and Jordan," Discussion Papers Series, Department of Economics, Tufts University 0823, Department of Economics, Tufts University.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:71:y:2018:i:1:p:3-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ilr.cornell.edu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.