IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ilrrev/v66y2013i2p487-510.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Unionization on Graduate Student Employees: Faculty-Student Relations, Academic Freedom, and Pay

Author

Listed:
  • Sean E. Rogers
  • Adrienne E. Eaton
  • Paula B. Voos

Abstract

In cases involving unionization of graduate student research and teaching assistants at private U.S. universities, the National Labor Relations Board has, at times, denied collective bargaining rights on the presumption that unionization would harm faculty-student relations and academic freedom. Using survey data collected from PhD students in five academic disciplines across eight public U.S. universities, the authors compare represented and non-represented graduate student employees in terms of faculty-student relations, academic freedom, and pay. Unionization does not have the presumed negative effect on student outcomes, and in some cases has a positive effect. Union-represented graduate student employees report higher levels of personal and professional support, unionized graduate student employees fare better on pay, and unionized and nonunionized students report similar perceptions of academic freedom. These findings suggest that potential harm to faculty-student relationships and academic freedom should not continue to serve as bases for the denial of collective bargaining rights to graduate student employees.

Suggested Citation

  • Sean E. Rogers & Adrienne E. Eaton & Paula B. Voos, 2013. "Effects of Unionization on Graduate Student Employees: Faculty-Student Relations, Academic Freedom, and Pay," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 66(2), pages 487-510, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:66:y:2013:i:2:p:487-510
    DOI: 10.1177/001979391306600208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/001979391306600208
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/001979391306600208?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:66:y:2013:i:2:p:487-510. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ilr.cornell.edu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.