IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v8y1984i3p307-326.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methodological Issues in Health Surveys

Author

Listed:
  • Marc L. Berk

    (National Center for Health Services Research)

  • Gail R. Wilensky

    (National Center for Health Services Research)

  • Steven B. Cohen

    (National Center for Health Services Research)

Abstract

The National Medical Care Expenditure Survey (NMCES) is one of the most comprehen sive health surveys ever conducted by the federal government. NMCES used a series of procedures designed to increase the quality and accuracy of the data. Since many of these procedures are expensive and time-consuming, often survey researchers must choose between alternative bias reducing strategies. This article presentsfindingsfrom a series of methodological studies conducted to evaluate issues such as response bias, organizational effects, the effect of improved response rates, and the usefulness of surveys of medical providers and health insurers to supplement the data collected in a household health survey. The results of these investigations should prove useful in the design of future surveys.

Suggested Citation

  • Marc L. Berk & Gail R. Wilensky & Steven B. Cohen, 1984. "Methodological Issues in Health Surveys," Evaluation Review, , vol. 8(3), pages 307-326, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:8:y:1984:i:3:p:307-326
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8400800302
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X8400800302
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X8400800302?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:8:y:1984:i:3:p:307-326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.