IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v6y1982i4p505-520.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Classification Schemes Used in Reporting Criminal Justice Data

Author

Listed:
  • L.J. Hubert

    (University of California-Santa Barbara)

  • R.G. Golledge

    (University of California-Santa Barbara)

  • T. Kenney

    (University of California-Santa Barbara)

  • C.M. Costanzo

    (University of California-Santa Barbara)

Abstract

Three methodological topics are developed within the context of presenting statistical information through the use of some a priori classification schemes. First, a strategy is defined for evaluating the utility of a given classification that is based on, say, spatial contiguity or population. A heuristic optimization technique is then suggested as a way of constructing possibly better categorizations from secondary data sources. Finally, a method is given for comparing the adequacy of any two different classifications. Throughout the paper we discuss an example that involves crime rate data for 40 cities in the Los Angeles area

Suggested Citation

  • L.J. Hubert & R.G. Golledge & T. Kenney & C.M. Costanzo, 1982. "Evaluating Classification Schemes Used in Reporting Criminal Justice Data," Evaluation Review, , vol. 6(4), pages 505-520, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:6:y:1982:i:4:p:505-520
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8200600403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X8200600403
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X8200600403?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:6:y:1982:i:4:p:505-520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.