Author
Listed:
- Amota Ataneka
- Benjamin Kelcey
- Yanli Xie
- Fangxing Bai
- Leigh McLean
- Jean Baptiste Habarurema
Abstract
Multilevel mediation analyses are vital for testing and refining theories of action in program evaluations. Prior literature and established guidelines have repeatedly underscored the need to prospectively incorporate mediation considerations when designing a study even when mediation is considered a secondary or exploratory aim. Despite the critical role mediation analyses play across disciplines, the available empirical resources to facilitate effective and efficient design of such studies are limited. This study contributes to this gap by developing empirical estimates of design parameter values for literacy programs implemented within classrooms by teachers. Using data from two large studies with thousands of students and hundreds of teachers and schools, we develop empirical guidelines for studies using a three-level structure (students, teachers, and schools) for a diverse set of school contexts (e.g., urban and geographic regions) and mediators (e.g., teacher knowledge, instruction, affect, attitudes, and classroom climate). The results suggested considerable variation in the clustering of teacher mediators and student outcomes within schools and that such clustering is dependent on the variable type (e.g., instruction, knowledge, climate, and literacy achievement) and study context. The findings underscore the importance of context-, mediator-, and outcome-specific design parameter values in planning studies.
Suggested Citation
Amota Ataneka & Benjamin Kelcey & Yanli Xie & Fangxing Bai & Leigh McLean & Jean Baptiste Habarurema, 2026.
"Evaluations of Literacy-Based Programs: Empirical Values for Designing Studies Probing Mediation,"
Evaluation Review, , vol. 50(4), pages 674-718, August.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:evarev:v:50:y:2026:i:4:p:674-718
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X261426107
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:50:y:2026:i:4:p:674-718. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.